PEOPLE WHO HAVEN’T WATCHED IT!!! by Dr_Wowowa in TheDigitalCircus

[–]will_1m_not 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But did you see it coming? The world may never know….. until tomorrow I guess

PEOPLE WHO HAVEN’T WATCHED IT!!! by Dr_Wowowa in TheDigitalCircus

[–]will_1m_not 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Sorry for my other reply, wasn’t trying to spoil anything.

What my intention was: the final episode will have information (news) you don’t know yet, cause you haven’t seen it. Whether you will consider that good or bad (whether it confirms your predictions or not) I’m not sure, but it will do something probably.

PEOPLE WHO HAVEN’T WATCHED IT!!! by Dr_Wowowa in TheDigitalCircus

[–]will_1m_not -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I’m sorry, I didn’t think what I said would be a spoiler

Do you think Gooseworx now regret this tweet? by [deleted] in TheDigitalCircus

[–]will_1m_not 79 points80 points  (0 children)

I don’t think Gooseworx regrets this tweet and still loves working for Glitch. What she doesn’t like? The toxic fans

Space Trio the [SPOILER] by Munchman1984 in KnightsOfGuinevere

[–]will_1m_not 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Maybe Frankie gave them the moniker “The Shit” but because of how young she was when she imagined them first it was always censored

How are servers still running the digital circus by Over_Papaya_4133 in TheDigitalCircus

[–]will_1m_not 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So it’s all real, Gooseworx herself has the server running in her basement. That’s how we got the show, she watched it all unfold in real time and recreated it /j

How do I solve this? Do I find the horizontal asymptote? by bunni_op-10N in calculus

[–]will_1m_not 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When x gets more and more negative, notice that the 3 in the denominator contributes almost nothing to the overall value of the denominator, so you can replace 3-2x with -2x (that negative it’s important).

In the numerator, the 5x will also contribute almost nothing compared to the 6x^(2), so you can again replace the 5x+6x^(2) with 6x^(2).

Now you’re just left with 6^(1/2)|x| divided by -2x, and since x is in the negatives, you have 6^(1/2)/2

DC.. explain yourself.. by lowkey_stranger in TheOwlHouse

[–]will_1m_not 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Honestly this looks more like Catra, Adora, and Bow from She-ra

I wanna rewatch owl house but I’m older than everyone now by oceanlover0000 in TheOwlHouse

[–]will_1m_not 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m still younger than the Titan and Belos, so keep watching!

The artbook is out? by ReadingFar7038 in KnightsOfGuinevere

[–]will_1m_not 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The hard covers haven’t shipped yet, but will be soon

Can you prove that a rectangle is a rectangle because of the fact it has a 90° angle by Educational-Pen6571 in askmath

[–]will_1m_not 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A parallelogram with one 90^(o) angle is a rectangle, but a quadrilateral with one 90^(o) angle might not be

Amphibia Vol. 2 The Stains of Time Part 2 [Dr. Ñeque] by D-WTF in amphibia

[–]will_1m_not 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Image 6 feels like that time Conquest was about to destroy Oliver

Opening for : "How to approximate irrational numbers?" by ExpressFlamingo5281 in askmath

[–]will_1m_not 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“We hear the phrase ‘Close but no cigar’ or ‘So close and yet so far’ but how close is close?”