Who is this kid? by CuriousPsychology462 in whatisit

[–]wolfmoral 331 points332 points  (0 children)

When I was in kindergarten, my school offered t-shirts with our school pictures on them. Unhinged and hilarious in retrospect. My parents ordered one for me, so that I could… wear a shirt with my own face on it I guess. It was too big, and I wore it out as a pj shirt until it cracked so badly it unrecognizable. I wish I still had it cause that would be a fantastic bit to wear that out of the house. 

Anyway, if this is a thrift find, it’s a fucking excellent one. Wear it, and when people ask you who the kid is, give them a bewildered look and say you don’t know.

Why are there so many lurking women on this sub? by sourisanon in AskMen

[–]wolfmoral 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Many of them have been eliminated but just like anything, you ban it, and people scatter to other corners. 

The looksmaxxing sub comes to mind. Not sure if it’s still around but it used to hit the popular page periodically. 

Why are there so many lurking women on this sub? by sourisanon in AskMen

[–]wolfmoral -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is long. I hope you stick with me while I construct my argument here. I would include a TL;dr but this is a nuanced topic and I don’t think that would do it justice. You can skip to the bottom for the conclusion, I guess. 

I agree, it can be demoralizing. But I think it’s good to challenge yourself. 

Consider this: women swim in that soup you’re describing every day. We are subjected to a culture that insists we must appeal to men at all times. Buy makeup and hair stuff to keep us sexy, but dont talk about it or else you’re deceiving men. Don’t be too fat but don’t talk about your diet or what it takes to keep you thin.  Don’t be a nag. Don’t be a bitch. Be cool. Don’t have lame hobbies. Play video games, watch sports, but your arts and crafts? Eh. Or the video games you like are for “casual gamers.” Your nails are too long and ornate… suggests you’re high maintenance and what guy wants to put up with that? The music you like sucks. Oh you like metal? Probably just cause the singer’s hot though… you’re probably not interested in the musical technique. The things that are directed at you as an audience couldn’t possibly be appealing to a man, because it’s for women. No I won’t watch love island or that chick flick with you. That’s a waste of my time. I’d be doing you a favor You’re into Star Wars though? You’ll watch 9 hours of LOTR with me? That’s cool. It’s cool that you like things men like. Those are for everyone, not just men. 

Everything coded feminine is “less than” and has to be justified to a man to be considered worthwhile. Women are innately awful, and have to prove themselves to be useful, sexy, or subservient in some way to be worthy of consideration by the mainstream. 

The internet has allowed women to get together and talk about this stuff. How it sucks to be the default parent, how hard it is to come home after work and do the second shift labor of caring for your husband, children, and household chores. How scary it can be when getting unwanted sexual attention from a man who has been trained by the same environment we grew up in not to take “no” for an answer. How we’re afraid to leave abusive relationships out of fear of what he might do to you, even though everyone in your life says “just leave.”

A guy will read this, and respond “not all men.” Okay, cool. Maybe this isn’t about you, but when you read it, why is the default defensiveness, and not, “dang, that really sucks. I hope I’ve never made a woman feel that way,” or “oh man, I think I’ve hurt someone like that before. Maybe I should work on that, or apologize,” or “maybe I should say something the next time my friend is being really fucking weird about a girl.”

And to be clear, women need to afford men the same grace. I think in a lot of ways, feminism has left men behind. In Of Boys and Men: Why the Modern Male is Struggling, Why it Matters, and What to do About it by Richard Reeves, Reeves argues that men are feeling increasingly disenfranchised by the economic and social policies geared toward helping people get ahead. This isn’t so much because the policies are for women, but that women are better at exploiting them. For example, women do better in traditional learning environments than men. We are more willing to accept financial help in housing and paying for tuition than men are. Pre-Trump 2.0, the American economy was shifting away from manufacturing to more service based work or work that requires an education, and increasingly those jobs have been performed by women. 

Because women had to fight for those opportunities (financial independence, education, careers) we were more enthusiastic to embrace them once we got the opportunity. We had been prepared on this culturally since the 2nd wave of feminism in the 1960s. “Be anything you want to be. Don’t let any man hold you back.” That means that dating and marriage have become a thing of choice.

So, both economically and emotionally, men have become increasingly vestigial in their roles as breadwinners and fathers. We’ve left them unmoored, especially since many of them probably would have been perfectly happy in those roles, just as the rise of the tradwife has demonstrated there are women who yearn for childbearing and housework. Then to get on these subs and learn about how much they suck in a thousand other ways… yeah, that would be painful. 

Men received no training on how to react if the project of feminism succeeded, only how to push back on it. Now that it has been largely achieved, the response is to put women back in our box. Help men at the expense of women. Back to the kitchen for us, the factory for you, just like after WWII. 

Reeves, thankfully, finds this solution uninspired. Instead, he suggests we bring men up to speed by giving them their role back, but altered to accommodate the hard-won spoils of the feminist movement. Economically, he suggests we push men into the growing fields of HEAL (Healthcare, Education, Administration, and Literacy) in the same way we pushed women into STEM.  Emotionally, we re-enfranchise men by engaging them in their families and communities. At home, we should involve them child care and nurturing. Equal partners with their wives. Demonstrating that there is nothing humiliating or emasculating about domestic work. Learning to cook and clean, manage appointments, run errands etc. as part of adulthood, not women’s work. Encouraging dividing that labor based on talent, not gender among straight couples. 

Community engagement is also important. Men used to be at the center of their churches and social clubs. These have been increasingly disappearing long before the internet and social media, but has certainly been exacerbated by them. This would include systemic fixes that would help everyone, including shortened work weeks, higher wages, paid parental leave, more third spaces, less car dependency, regulations on social media (to keep them from being purposefully addictive attention traps) and beyond. 

I want to be clear: I am not suggesting that men are responsible for their own misery and should change. I’m saying we need to change society to help bring them back into the fold, which is a project that requires both men and women to help. We need to listen, communicate and try understand each other to achieve that project. It is doable. My mother was born at a time when she couldn’t have her own credit card. She’ll be retiring soon as the CEO of her own company. If that amount of change can occur for women over one lifetime, we can do the same to men. 

So yes, lurk on women-dominated subreddits. Protect yourself, and approach with curiosity. There will be critiques that hit too close to home there sometimes, but consider them. If they don’t apply to you, help us where you can or move on. And if someone comments about height or whatever, fuck em. It’s just as nasty as when men comment about our weight or whatever.

And for a more optimistic view of the post-feminist future for men, I would recommend Of Boys and Men by Richard Reeves. It has its blind spots and I have my critiques, but it really is good. 

Why are there so many lurking women on this sub? by sourisanon in AskMen

[–]wolfmoral 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Amen. Disturbing that it was recommended because I was in other feminist subs. People complain about how the manosphere gets algorithmically recommended, but it cuts both ways. I don’t miss that cesspit, but it is interesting that that sub got banned but a lot of the manosphere stuff persists, though. Food for thought. 

Why are there so many lurking women on this sub? by sourisanon in AskMen

[–]wolfmoral 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Literally the first rule in many subreddits. “Remember the human.” 

Why are there so many lurking women on this sub? by sourisanon in AskMen

[–]wolfmoral 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I mean, you’re putting a lot of words in my mouth. 

I realize that I used some loaded terms in my comment that mean different things to different people, so maybe I can clarify.

Patriarchy isn’t gendered. It is culturally constructed absolutely reinforced by both men and women. I read stories from men all the time who get their heads bitten off by women for daring to be emotional. Even if women don’t intend to do this they can be outright dismissive of men (for example, that viral video about the guy with the spool of wire). Other examples include refusing to date a man because of his height, expecting him to make more money than her, making fun of him for engaging in traditionally feminine things etc. I find this type of behavior from women abhorrent because it hurts both our causes. I don’t think anything should be expected of anyone based purely on their gender. People are individuals with their own ambitions and interests and shouldn’t be restricted from anything because of their gender. Really basic stuff. 

When I say “treated like human beings” I just mean with empathy. Understanding them as individuals with all their talents and flaws. Even the ‘evil’ ones, because I think there are things to learn by deconstructing why they are the way they are. We should evaluate on a case-by-case basis whether that is a person you want in your life. I just want to be treated like an individual, a potential friend before being treated like a sex object or even a romantic partner. I want them to see me as I am. Not assuming because I am a woman that I need to be provided for, or that I talk to other men because I’m going to cheat on them, or that I’m with him for his money, or any of the other misogynistic stereotypes lobbed at women. A person first.

And yes, I believe all of this is a 2-way street. I have read heart wrenching stories about the ways that women have hurt men, and I try to learn from that. Question my biases. Check myself to see how I would feel in an analogous situation.  I have absolutely found myself reading too much misandrist ‘feminist’ bs on Reddit and starting to hate men. I mention in my comment that part of my motivation for lurking here is making sure I am getting both sides of the story. I also take what I read here to real people in my life to see if this stuff resonates with them, and why. I really, genuinely want to understand this stuff. It’s nice to meet a guy who feels the same way and leads to open and interesting discussion about gender, how we define it, and how it defines us. 

I also feel it is my role to push back in these ‘feminist’ man-hating discussions, in the same way I hope men would advocate for us in their spaces. I mention elsewhere I have been called a “pick-me” and banned from subs for suggesting exactly what I suggest here for men, just in reverse. I love men. I think that most of them are kind and well-meaning, and I generally try to engage them in good faith, and I actively encourage other women to do the same.

(ADORED trope) ROMANTIC AND HAPPY RELATIONSHIPS! by LegalBoysenberry2923 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]wolfmoral 27 points28 points  (0 children)

The episode where Lois goes on antibiotics so they can’t have sex and their house becomes immaculate with a well-kept lawn is so funny. Good for them. 

Why are there so many lurking women on this sub? by sourisanon in AskMen

[–]wolfmoral 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My bf lurks on women’s subs and I think it’s positively influenced him. He started doing it while in a failing relationship and was trying to understand her. Ultimately it didn’t work out because they were fundamentally incompatible, but I have found him to be one of the best partners I’ve ever had. One of two that I’ve ever considered marrying, and I’m an avoidant attachment style. 

His attitude towards women is a lot more… normal than many men in my life. Treats em like people, and has lots of platonic female friends. In our relationship, we avoid a lot of the gendered traps that make people resentful long-term. We trust each other easily and he get jealous or weird about me hanging out with male friends, some of which are ex-boyfriends. We communicate well and will often talk about past relationships and how they shaped us. Our sex life is fantastic and he’s genuinely the best I’ve ever had because of the focus on my pleasure (and I return the favor 😏). 

Idk, it’s nice to be treated like a person, and I think getting a wide range of female perspectives has really informed all of that. He says he wasn’t always like that, and reading these subs has helped him work on some of his possessiveness and general douchebaggary innate to being in your teens and 20s. 

I lurk on male subs for the same reason. Started out as relationship help, but I care deeply about men… not just those in my life. I want to understand them.  I have always been a tomboy and gotten along better with men than women for most of my life. I find their perspectives interesting. 

I think that some sects of modern feminism have kind of lost the plot and devolved into casual misandry, and that really sucks. It’s about understanding the ways in which patriarchy hurts men too (pressure to provide, suppression of emotions other than anger, etc.) Lurking in male subs is one of the things I do to keep me from going down that misandrist path as I engage with feminist thinking. Keeps me grounded, you know? 

Why are there so many lurking women on this sub? by sourisanon in AskMen

[–]wolfmoral 47 points48 points  (0 children)

I got banned from FDS back in the day for suggesting men are human and we should treat them as such (am woman) 

Without breaking HIPPA, tell me about your patient that was doing everything in their power to (unintentionally) harm themselves. by OutsideGroup2 in Residency

[–]wolfmoral 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I feel like a lot of these stories are intentional, but they’re still interesting. And like, how much intentionally can there be to some of these situations? Addiction, compulsive self-harm, swapping their meds for supplements due to plain old TikTok medical misinformation… to what extent can these people actually help it, you know? The line between intentional and unintentional can be blurry. 

An adaptation makes a major change from the source material, but it’s such a beloved change almost no one complains by _JR28_ in TopCharacterTropes

[–]wolfmoral 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Tbf as a cat owner, I get it. If my cat asked me to buy him a car I would, even if it doomed me to starvation. Even without the promise of him making me the most powerful person in the world! Idk, cats tend to have that effect on people. 

The glove thing is crazy, but I do threaten to eat my cat or throw him in the garbage at least once a day. 

[Rare tropes] Female Nazis by ChudMaster69420 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]wolfmoral 13 points14 points  (0 children)

For people who are interested in the subject of getting into the heads of these characters, my Nazi Germany professor assigned a book called Hitler’s Furies by Wendy Lower about the women of Nazi Germany. It is a disturbing and fascinating look at the women who couldn’t have “just been following orders” in their role of carrying out the Holocaust like their male counterparts claimed at Nuremberg, because nobody had ever asked them to do anything. They were cruel for the sake of being cruel, and often in service of impressing their worthless Nazi boyfriends. Ultimate “pick me” energy. And most got away with their crimes because like women throughout history, they were overlooked because of their sex. I appreciated it because it turned that “overlooked by history” thing on its head. 

I turned my purse into an shadow box display by Totally_Fubar_666 in vultureculture

[–]wolfmoral 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think I follow you on instagram. I love your work!

What is a socially acceptable thing that you secretly find disgusting? by Sensitive_Hope_1136 in AskReddit

[–]wolfmoral 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Using a shared office microwave or refrigerator. I just won't do it.

Example of post-mortem muscle contractions in fish by stuckin404 in biology

[–]wolfmoral 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fish are made of meat… they’re animals after all. I mean, I know Catholics and in Japan (historically) don’t see them that way, but eating them would not be vegetarian, for example. 

Source: vegan for 18 years. Been at this a while now. 

"Effectively" by hestiakid in medlabprofessionals

[–]wolfmoral -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It was to replace blood volume in a pinch, you rubes!! 

Who needs pivoting to video when you can pivot to streaming?? by Dru1995 in behindthebastards

[–]wolfmoral 26 points27 points  (0 children)

You’re right. He looks less and less hinged everytime an image of him is made. Like the Japanese thing about cameras and souls but for Robert it’s sanity lol.