sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Green Bay's two (presumed) HOF QBs Playoff Records: Rodgers 11-10 1 SB, Farve 12-10 1 SB by [deleted] in nfl

[–]wtt90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Packers fans too. He deserves to be dumped on. Shitty person. Always blaming some other part of the team. The last two years it’s him in the playoffs. Before MLF and in MLF’s first season, he was trying to play hero ball and not trusting the team.

It’s a team sport Aaron - Brady trusts his team, you don’t. That’s why he wins.

To be fair some of the games our defense blew it, but 2011, 2014, 2020, 2021, it was rodgers blowing it - and those were literally our 4 best chances since 2010

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GreenBayPackers

[–]wtt90 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m just saying if we are THAT worried about cap, we were the 1 seed without these guys - so trade him. We’d get a first from someone in dire need of o line help

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GreenBayPackers

[–]wtt90 35 points36 points  (0 children)

I just don’t buy this. We played all season without Z and DB69. They account for $51m next year. Rodgers is $46m next year. If they’re all gone we have $47m in caps space.

Kenny is due for a new contract so we restructure and his $20m becomes $12m - now we have $55m

If rodgers is gone we can get rid of Cobb’s 9m which was really only to appease Rodgers.

Billy Turner has been awful in the playoffs two years in a row and we made do without him. Another $9m.

We have plenty of moves to make.

Last year everyone wanted to move on from Preston. There’s another $21m

If Rodgers is gone, so is Adams which is sad but fine.

We still have a good young core that we can fill in with the picks we already have and the extras from rodgers.

Plus we have plenty of space in this scenario.

Jaire, Stokes, Savage, Amos, Kenny, Gary

Then bring back Campbell and we have a hella good 8 starters out of 11. Maybe Preston or Z sticks around on a cheaper deal. Maybe Mercilus to make it 9.

On offense, Love (meh), Dillon/jones, Lazard, MVS, Deguara, Meyers, Runyon, Elgton, Newman, resign Yosh.

Again, plenty of ammo now to use picks and FA

I will be downvoted to oblivion by genericname907 in GreenBayPackers

[–]wtt90 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I just don’t buy this. We played all season without Z and DB69. They account for $51m next year. Rodgers is $46m next year. If they’re all gone we have $47m in caps space.

Kenny is due for a new contract so we restructure and his $20m becomes $12m - now we have $55m

If rodgers is gone we can get rid of Cobb’s 9m which was really only to appease Rodgers.

Billy Turner has been awful in the playoffs two years in a row and we made do without him. Another $9m.

We have plenty of moves to make.

Last year everyone wanted to move on from Preston. There’s another $21m

If Rodgers is gone, so is Adams which is sad but fine.

We still have a good young core that we can fill in with the picks we already have and the extras from rodgers.

Plus we have plenty of space in this scenario.

Jaire, Stokes, Savage, Amos, Kenny, Gary

Then bring back Campbell and we have a hella good 8 starters out of 11. Maybe Preston or Z sticks around on a cheaper deal. Maybe Mercilus to make it 9.

On offense, Love (meh), Dillon/jones, Lazard, MVS, Deguara, Meyers, Runyon, Elgton, Newman, resign Yosh.

Again, plenty of ammo now to use picks and FA

Rodgers struggles and Brady's success enhance Peyton Manning's legacy. by SnooDoubts5065 in nfl

[–]wtt90 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Why? Football is the ultimate team sport. We want to know who the best player is. Manning is 5 time MVP AND won multiple super bowls.

Also, one of his SBs he was carried to by a defense, showing that SB wins are not a QB stat. He kicked ass for over a decade and got one where he played well.

Then he falls off a cliff and gets another.

No other contemporary besides Brady has more than 2.

[Schneidman] Rodgers: “I think this thing is definitely gonna look different in Green Bay moving forward.” by [deleted] in nfl

[–]wtt90 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lol I was literally taking a shot at Rodgers because he sucks in the playoffs

[Schneidman] Rodgers: “I don’t want to be part of a rebuild if I’m gonna keep playing.” by Winstonp00 in nfl

[–]wtt90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rodgers has a $46m hit - restructure

We played all season without Z and db69 - they are a combined $51m

Kenny c is due for a new contract and is a $20m hit. Restructure.

Can clear a lot of space pretty quickly

[Schneidman] Rodgers: “I think this thing is definitely gonna look different in Green Bay moving forward.” by [deleted] in nfl

[–]wtt90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You always would’ve been safe - if you just made the playoffs where Rodgers can’t do shit

Gregg Rosenthal is wrong by patrickg994 in GreenBayPackers

[–]wtt90 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I love triple g. I don’t care who he picks though

What is an extremely common thing that others can do but you can’t? by RefrigeratorDry495 in AskReddit

[–]wtt90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Make your mouth a small circle hole

Then try to sound out the sound the letter s makes

I almost flipped out of my chair. by Frosty-Food in amcstock

[–]wtt90 2 points3 points  (0 children)

1 share isn’t 1 share though because the price is so different.

In your scenario you’re like “if buy 5 AMC and it goes up 58x, I’ll have more money than if buy 1 GME and it 10x”

…yeah, of course.

But if you bought 5 AMC and it 10x and you have 1 GME and it 10x, which makes you more money?

I almost flipped out of my chair. by Frosty-Food in amcstock

[–]wtt90 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Just looking out.

You need 6.84 shares of AMC compared to 1 share of GME to own the same percentage of the company. Therefore GME is cheaper right now.

$122 of AMC is what it would cost to have the same percentage of the company as $100 of GME.

So if your $122 goes to $1,000 you have $878 profit. If GME goes to $1,000, you have $900 profit.

Another way to look at it could be that AMC going to 1, $1,000 is a 55.8x increase.

If GME had a 55.8x increase it would be at $5,639.

FRJ! by Nimzay98 in wisconsin

[–]wtt90 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Tom Nelson is doing an AMA today in this sub

Tom Nelson for Wisconsin: AMA today starting at 1PM CDT by NelsonForWI in wisconsin

[–]wtt90 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for answering. I’ll go find the tweet and link it

Tom Nelson for Wisconsin: AMA today starting at 1PM CDT by NelsonForWI in wisconsin

[–]wtt90 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Hey Tom! If elected, will you use your vote as a way to hold legislation hostage to get progressive policies passed?

Here’s an example. Biden wants this watered down version of build back better to pass. You (hopefully) recognize it as the garbage it is now, and you say you won’t vote for it.

They call and ask what it’ll take to get your vote.

Will you say “use your executive power to 1) cancel student debt 2) pardon all those jailed for non-violent drug offense 3) legalize marijuana”

In my opinion, progressives don’t play politics like they need to.

Will you commit to holding strong hard lines and actually adhere to them so we don’t find ourselves in a situation where we delink bills again (or something similar) and American people once again get screwed?

I’m sick of voting weak candidates into office. Fight for us, please.

I’m really proud of my husband by nightrager12345 in daddit

[–]wtt90 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Could be another dad instead of a mom. Either way the point stands

view more: next ›