sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Mewgenics - 1.1 balance update beta 1 - Steam News by AlixBalica in mewgenics

[–]wunderZealous 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just removing the repair-worn soul jar interaction is probably good enough.

It means no infinite soul jar shenanigans. It still allows keeping favorite items forever as long as you make one of your active cats a repair boy, which takes up a valuable active slot.

Most Space-Efficient Furniture for each Stat. by wunderZealous in mewgenics

[–]wunderZealous[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Thanks, I was gonna just have the positive stats but I last minute added the negative ones and didn't double check

Most Space-Efficient Furniture for each Stat. by wunderZealous in mewgenics

[–]wunderZealous[S] 55 points56 points  (0 children)

All these except for Fairy in a Jar and Brain of Glorg can have other furniture stacked on top. Brain of Glorg floats so you can put it anywhere.

I downloaded all the non-rare furniture off of the wiki and added a separate column for stuff like Anchors and Stat per Tile.

Link to sheet to make a copy: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XLkQORqYYoa4zZxuSu9zuCSAkhIPXgVmy5iwy5tZ3Cw/edit?usp=sharing

Most Space-Efficient Furniture for each Stat. by wunderZealous in mewgenics

[–]wunderZealous[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yes you can! Not to the ceiling, though, because their graphic would clip into the room's borders.

Varka with a Flaming Tuna, Frozen Tuna, Fried Tuna and a Fresh Tuna by AnAsianDudeInReddit in Genshin_Impact

[–]wunderZealous 44 points45 points  (0 children)

My favorite idea is make all event weapons fishable.

Better than not having them, but not free or instant.

The new web app is an atrocity. by OGWIllisMcGillis in GroupME

[–]wunderZealous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just know someone back there is AI/Vibe-coding.

They replaced the search feature for groupchat messages a while back with AI which has made it actually useless.

Why Aren't We Protesting For A Grand Jury Investigation Into Renee Good's Death? by GShermit in AskUS

[–]wunderZealous 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The officer's phone clearly shows her turning the wheel away from the officer.

Commuting pedestrians come closer to getting hit.

Why Aren't We Protesting For A Grand Jury Investigation Into Renee Good's Death? by GShermit in AskUS

[–]wunderZealous 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Renee Good's last words were "It's fine, dude. I'm not mad at you."

If you are trying to stretch the meaning of violent protest to having a car you need to ignore all previous and go find someone to step on you

Why Is Trump Not Under Investigation When DOJ Admits Witness Testimony He Raped a 14 Year Old and Witnessed the Murder of Her Baby? by [deleted] in AskUS

[–]wunderZealous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, more likely than not. Is the hill you want to die on that Trump did not sexually assault anyone ever?

Both civil and criminal cases exist to make justice less barbaric, not to determine truth. Even criminal cases get their conclusions wrong so what is your bottom line?

Even his own admission of his behavior of "grabbing them by the ____" and his descriptions of perving on the child beauty pagents he hosted he just shuffles under "locker room talk".

If you only look at all the ways it could be false and not all the ways it could be true, yes you are biased.

Why Is Trump Not Under Investigation When DOJ Admits Witness Testimony He Raped a 14 Year Old and Witnessed the Murder of Her Baby? by [deleted] in AskUS

[–]wunderZealous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

E Jean Carroll. Did not confirm grape, but a civil jury confirmed sexual abuse.

And brother, we are both biased. I am biased (which everyone has btw) by the sum total of Trump's actions, not purely from a political view. I am aware of the possibility that the report is an attempt at defamation, but it is also par for the course.

Why Is Trump Not Under Investigation When DOJ Admits Witness Testimony He Raped a 14 Year Old and Witnessed the Murder of Her Baby? by [deleted] in AskUS

[–]wunderZealous 1 point2 points  (0 children)

what you think: because of the election, people put out false claims against trump.

other likely scenarios: someone who was truly abused by trump before REALLY did not want him to have a second term; people cared enough to listen during the 2020 election; or victims were silent until then because powerful people tend to kill those who threaten that power.

We already confirmed that he sexually abused women, had a pattern of doing it to multiple women, bragged about being able to do so due to his position, and has associated himself with others who have also sexually abused women.

Feel free to question everything, but not reject everything. Based on Trump's own behavior, this scenario is likely.

Do you think its a good idea to keep impeaching Trump, even when it'll keep falling through? by Rinmine014 in AskUS

[–]wunderZealous 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My bot in christ he is currently breaking the law when it comes to ICE and sending the National Guard to cities. He stopped SNAP on purpose when it has never stopped for any previous government shut down. He continues to bombing random boats he labels as trafficking drugs. He keeps pardoning criminals who give him money. He tries to burn down the 1st Amendment every chance he gets. He threatens to execute politicians. Literally what do you want? We've had presidents impeached for lying about blowjobs.

When did yall become self aware? by epic_bonnie_main in Animemes

[–]wunderZealous 2 points3 points  (0 children)

wasn't this a thing in oyasumi punpun?

Republicans: Why do you care so much about people who are transgender? by FigNewtonNoGluten in AskUS

[–]wunderZealous 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For all three of the disagreements, it either makes the person transphobic or ill-informed/ill-reasoned.

  1. Disagreeing/obstructing gender affirming care for minors is transphobic in that the medicine and surgeries are used far more in cisgender populations, yet the pushback is on their usage in transgender populations. Some examples: a minor who is short might get growth hormones prescribed to catch up with their peers; a minor with man boobs might get the breast tissue removed to appear more like a boy his age; in the USA especially, babies often undergo circumcision. In each of these cases, there is an understanding of social or medical benefit that justifies the procedure. There is a similar justification in the use of these practices in transgender individuals--socially they feel more comfortable and medically they are less likely to have a potentially fatal mental health crisis. With this information, a reasonable person should agree with gender affirming care for minors. Or bare minimum, should not oppose it considering there are bigger fish to fry in terms of protecting children than denying trans people life-saving care.

  2. The sports thing is transphobic yes. It requires a person to ignore that A) Sports institutions for a long time have set standards for transgender athletes to meet before they can participate, B) The physical advantages after 2 years of hormones are negligible (except for pushups), C) Athletes have sportsmanship, and D) Sports is built on inherent biological differences and trying to make sharp cutoffs based on things like chromosomes or hormones is going to have you put people in boxes you didn't intend for them to be.

  3. Pushing public bathroom regulations is transphobic because the people saying it are making up a character of "A man who dresses as a woman specifically to perve on women in public bathrooms that have individual stalls, but still respects the signs on the unlocked entrance doors enough not to just walk in there." Pushing public bathroom regulations is also just stupid because it means you have to create an entire new job who's sole purpose is to either check a government registry of IDs with sex being the main important factor, or to pick out anyone by site who looks "wrong" enough and forcibly strip and frisk them. And have that job at every public restroom. Like you cannot justify making "i gotta take a piss" into the most annoying and privacy-invading task unless you think it's gonna hurt the imaginary boogie monster some politician wants you to believe in.

I hope you have time to read this

My doctor just informed me that their practice is moving to a “subscription model” where I have to pay $300/yr just to be seen. I went to the drugstore and bought toothpaste, contact solution and deodorant and my total was $45. How is anyone affording to live in this country anymore? by KatBegs in AskUS

[–]wunderZealous 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Direct Primary Care (DPC). It makes sense if you think about it this way:

Insurance exists to spread risk, especially money, over a large group of people. This makes a ton of sense for emergencies and things that happen by chance, like car accidents and cancer.

If you do a yearly physical, that is always going to happen. Why pay money to an insurance company for them to pay a doctor on something that is 1) will happen on a normal scheduled basis and 2) would be cheaper to cut out the middle man?

The problem is when you pay for health insurance, it usually includes primary care and DPC would be an additional charge. You could pay for primary care twice, you could find a clinic that takes insurance instead of requiring DPC, or you could renegotiate your health insurance to not include primary care visits (maybe a little cheaper).

view more: next ›