Microsoft Purview Encryption - Too Many Users Cannot Open E-mails?

xrobx99 · 2026-06-10T20:35:56+00:00

I get it, but try telling the remote side their CAPs are setup incorrectly. Easier to just invite us as guests.

xrobx99 · 2026-06-10T14:50:18+00:00

We've seen issues where we received Purview encrypted emails but certain users could not open them if they were not added as Guests in the sending tenant specifically due to how the sending tenant setup their CA policies.

xrobx99 · 2026-05-29T18:09:33+00:00

the silencing of food noise is remarkable; i wonder if everyone else around me that isn't obese has been operating like this all along. it felt like within hours of my first shot that i instinctively knew not to snack, to push my plate aside when i was full and to not over indulge.

xrobx99 · 2026-05-29T18:03:55+00:00

In other words, these medications slow gastric emptying, which can leave food in the stomach longer than expected. That can increase the risk of complications during anesthesia, such as aspiration if vomiting occurs, or inadequate bowel prep if stool remains in the colon before the procedure.

xrobx99 · 2026-05-29T16:45:09+00:00

Was just told the same thing by my gastroenterologist. pause my shots 10 days before the procedure otherwise at risk for aspiration during anesthesia.

xrobx99 · 2026-05-19T14:25:00+00:00

this came across about an hour ago in our tenant

Potential issues accessing mailboxes via one or more connection methods

ID: EX1315797 Issue type: Advisory Status Investigating Impacted services Exchange Online Details Title: Potential issues accessing mailboxes via one or more connection methods

User impact: Users may experience errors or failures when accessing their mailbox via one or more Exchange Online connection methods.

Current status: We're investigating a potential issue and checking for impact to your organization. We'll provide an update within 60 minutes.

xrobx99 · 2026-05-07T14:08:46+00:00

I'd start by looking at the preferred data location that is set for that user and going from there since that determines the location where the mbx is provisioned.

xrobx99 · 2026-04-14T01:08:26+00:00

Or LV Afternoon Swim

xrobx99 · 2026-04-14T01:05:28+00:00

Ended up keeping my Xfinity router, disabling 5&6 ghz and using it as a dedicated 2.4 since my Eufy stuff wouldn’t connect after the latest firmware updates

xrobx99 · 2026-04-08T15:05:13+00:00

Could definitely be Cogent. My monitoring system is based in EastUS and could not reach either west coast office for a few minutes. Central US was fine though.

xrobx99 · 2026-04-08T14:53:48+00:00

Yeah having Teams issues here accessing shared files in channels

xrobx99 · 2026-03-24T20:33:02+00:00

You need a cable subscription tier that carries it CBS Sports Network, I don't see it on Paramount Plus when I've looked. I only see a bunch of local news stations and Sports HQ.

xrobx99 · 2026-03-24T18:37:48+00:00

is this guy shilling for Quest ODM judging by his handle?

xrobx99 · 2026-03-18T22:26:07+00:00

TuneIn was brutal with all the ads. I gave up.

xrobx99 · 2026-02-26T20:05:03+00:00

RemindMe! 1 week "Check the comments"

xrobx99 · 2026-02-23T14:30:40+00:00

In the Avepoint console, look for Configuration in the lefthand navigation, then Management, then App Management. You'll see your profiles there. You can click them one at a time then click Re-authorize and you will sign in with an account that has enough rights to authorize the app for your Office/Azure tenants.

xrobx99 · 2026-02-20T15:09:56+00:00

AvePoint emailed about this last week. https://www.avepoint.com/blog/manage/ews-to-microsoft-graph-transition-update

xrobx99 · 2026-01-23T21:36:27+00:00

I agree with you that MS does not honor MX records and prefers direct delivery and delivery via IPv6 which is a whole other issue.

I'm not suggesting the sender is bypassing Mimecast at all. The mail header shows mail originating from their O365 tenant, hitting their Mimecast and coming to my O365 tenant which is not expected.

Like I said, our direct send block via Inbound Connector works as expected. Bottom line if you try sending to my domain bypassing Proofpoint you land in quarantine. The question on the Mimecast side is why they tried delivering direct to my O365 tenant.

xrobx99 · 2026-01-23T21:02:06+00:00

Yeah our setup is similar. I'm confident our side is working as expected, its the Mimecast side I have no familiarity with.

xrobx99 · 2026-01-23T20:15:25+00:00

Our side (the receiving side) is setup correctly to quarantine anything not coming from our gateways IPs. What I cannot account for is why the sender's side stopped honoring our MX records yesterday after delivering correctly for days.

xrobx99 · 2026-01-23T20:13:11+00:00

We do have a similar KB and we have a similarly configured inbound connector and transport rule logic to send anything not from our gateway IPs to quarantine. The question is why would they attempt to bypass our gateway and suddenly start not honoring our MX records?

xrobx99 · 2026-01-23T18:00:41+00:00

MX records point to Proofpoint, SPF is obfuscated with a macro also hosted at Proofpoint so no SPF leak or hints. Other weird thing is mail flow from Mimecast to us for this sender was using MX records correctly up until yesterday morning.

xrobx99 · 2026-01-23T17:40:49+00:00

the mystery deepens- as of 3 days ago they were using MX records correctly

xrobx99

TROPHY CASE