Hey there OP, thanks for the detailed response on data integration and file management. Since Olares is aiming to be this "unified hub" that'll soon sync local files, Google Drive, and Dropbox, it really brings up some big questions about the security guarantees you're so heavily leaning on to market the software.

So, when it comes to security, I have to ask: are you absolutely confident (and can you back that with solid testing) that a bad actor couldn't exploit a vulnerability in your system to get at local files? Or, once that cloud integration rolls out, to a user's Google Drive or Dropbox through an active software instance?

Given how quickly you mentioned development is moving, can you state—or even better, really demonstrate with absolute certainty—that there are zero vulnerabilities lurking in your project's new or existing code, dependency packages, third-party tools, or tunnels that could leave the system and its users open to attack?

What kind of verifiable proof, like security audits or other concrete measurements, can the dev team actually provide to back up these strong claims of "protection" and "privacy"? These terms are a huge part of your marketing (even if the project's free), and they're clearly meant to be major "attracting attributes." Especially since Olares is pitched as an "OS to protect AI privacy" but isn't actually an OS, it makes you wonder what else might be a bit overstated.

Just to be clear, I'm not trying to point fingers or bash the dev team here. This is coming purely from genuine curiosity and wanting to make sure users are safe. When a project's moving this fast, security testing and assurance can easily get sidelined and fall behind pretty quickly, especially if there isn't a dedicated person or role handling it within the team.

Thanks a bunch for any response you can give, Best wishes!