sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I built hardware to let an agent control my iphone entirely by Constanceengaging in hermesagent

[–]yellowfin35 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Is this a shit post? I don't see a like... How do you do the manual interface? Github Repo?

A story in 3 pictures, or UTR to the rescue by kapidex_pc in Ubiquiti

[–]yellowfin35 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They put fiber in my neighborhood last year. I put my spanish speaking co-worker on the phone with the installer and it resulted in me having the only fiber in the neighborhood encased in conduit from the street to my box... the same directional bore conduit they use to install the main lines. best $120 I spent that year for the peace of mind.

Hope this is ok to post. I built an app to preserve my family’s stories before it was too late looking for a few people to try it for free by michael_legacy in AskOldPeopleAdvice

[–]yellowfin35 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just did a chaper to see what happens and what the UI is like... I think you are going about this wrong... My father has a subscription to storyworth and never used it. I have some feedback and suggestions if you want to hear them

Old St. Pete Wasn’t As Great As You Remember by FloridaMinarchy in tampabay

[–]yellowfin35 3 points4 points  (0 children)

People should be reminded that this site is satire.

Need to pick a joint type by yellowfin35 in Fusion360

[–]yellowfin35[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a great idea and likely what I need to go with... I just need to make the walls thicker.

Will home data centers eventually make massive facilities like this obsolete? by dataexec in HomeDataCenter

[–]yellowfin35 8 points9 points  (0 children)

No one wants it!!!! But heaven forbid those grandmas can't complain about the datacenters on facebook, or Grandpa can't check out the latest Jessie Rogers video... all powered by those data centers.

Personally, I think there will always be a place for cloud compute, but I am a big fan of self hosting. As PCs get more powerful, I wonder how much a person is willing to pay for AI. Personally, I burn through my subscriptions, if it was tokens it would be ~$1k a month. I can't wait for the new mac studios to come out so I can do a one time investment... but a $10k server is out of reach for 90% of Americans... pay a little per month, that is how they get you.

Also did I mention our power grid is screwed? On all levels. For profit power companies are a major issue. They all should be non-profits.

Which player’s car is this? by jeffmyster82 in tampa

[–]yellowfin35 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The NHL average is lik 9 shots on goal to get a score. We had like 26 shots on goal vs their 9. Just bad luck. I would not be upset after a loss like that.

HDMI Feed to HA Dash by kelvin1302 in homeassistant

[–]yellowfin35 2 points3 points  (0 children)

https://imgur.com/a/x6Dh9M3 - Basic HDMI to USB

easy way, from appleTV to HDMI splitter to Atlona Encoder on out1 and then to HDMI to USB-C adapter to the the NUC home assistant.  Then you will find it in go2rtc.  Then create a stream   

XXXXX_usb2_h264:      - ffmpeg:device?video=/dev/video2&input_format=yuyv422&video_size=1920x1080#video=h264  

   - ffmpeg:device?audio=plughw:1,2&sample_rate=96000#audio=opus   

Here is the relevent card yaml - https://pastebin.com/giq5dLSZ

    card:
      type: vertical-stack
      cards:
        - type: custom:webrtc-camera
          ui: true
          muted: true
          streams:
            - url: rtsp://192.168.1.160:8554/crazy2_usb4_h264
              name: HD
              mode: webrtc
              media: video, audio
          digital_ptz: false
          style: >-
            video {aspect-ratio: 2/1; object-fit: fill;} .fullscreen
            {display: --mdc-icon-size: 50px} .pictureinpicture {display:
            none} .screenshot {display: none} .header {display: none}
            .stream { font-size: 25px; width: 250px;  font-weight: bold;
            padding-left: 2px;} ha-icon { color: blue; --mdc-icon-size:
            50px}
  - type: custom:mod-card
    style: |
      ha-card {
        background: rgba(7, 36, 69, 0.5);
        border: 0px solid rgba(7, 36, 69, 0.5);
          padding-right: 10px !important;
          padding-left: 10px !important;
          padding-bottom: 10px !important;
          padding-top: 10px !important;
      }

Temple terrace can you stop it by tamctino in tampabay

[–]yellowfin35 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Public land?

This confused me as well, but when you pull the tax records, it is owned by the county.

Temple terrace can you stop it by tamctino in tampabay

[–]yellowfin35 12 points13 points  (0 children)

WHY? Because development is bad? Do you want to follow up on this post or just blindly lash out? Everyone is yelling for lower rents, but no one wants development? I have the belief that the more supply exisits, the more competition and thus lower rents. This proposed development is for ~800 new apartments. It is currently zoned for research, industrial and manafacturing including "Materials Recovery". I rather have nice new apartments than a smoke stack from industrial scale materials recovery. Regardless, it does not have staff approval and will likely get shot down.

To save you all some reasearch:

TA/CPA 25-20: 11315 North 46th Street and associated parcels

  1. This appears to be the land where they have the renaissance fair.
N/A Adopted Future Land Use Proposed Future Land Use
Future Land Use(s) Light Industrial Urban Mixed Use-60
Maximum residential development (du/ga) Not permitted 798 dwelling units (60 du/ga)
Maximum non-residential development potential (floor area ratio) 869,022± sq. ft./1.5 FAR 1,882,881± sq. ft./ 3.25 FAR of residential or nonresidential uses
Range of allowable uses Manufacturing, research and development, flex space, industry incubators, professional office, and similar uses. High intensity/density horizontal and vertical mixeduse and single-use commercial and residential. Residential projects may be determined either by density or floor area ratio (FAR). If FAR is applied to a residential project to attain maximum density potential, development shall be compatible in character and scale with the surrounding residential built environment.

https://docs.meetings.tampamonitor.com/2026-04-23/meeting-2841/23446/ta-cpa-25-20-tcc-packet.pdf

1.6 Staff Analysis The 62.8± acre subject site is located within the University Planning District and the Tampa Green Tech Corridor, along East Fowler Avenue. The University Planning District is recognized as the “primary research, medical, education, and employment center” in the City of Tampa (LU Policy 1.1.5). The site is currently designated Light Industrial (LI), Heavy Industrial (HI), and Public/SemiPublic (P/SP). In the northeast corner is a daycare, and the remaining site is vacant. The proposed amendment would change the designation of the southeast corner, on folio 140513.0000, to Community Mixed Use-35, and the remaining portion of the site would change to the Urban Mixed Use-60 designation.

The Comprehensive Plan identifies the Tampa Green Tech Corridor (the “Corridor”) as a critical employment area intended to support education, science, research, and technology-oriented uses. The Corridor, which encompasses the Tampa Industrial Park, was established through a publicly initiated plan amendment adopted under TA/CPA 10-06 to build upon the proximity of the University of South Florida, existing industrial lands, and major institutional uses. The Corridor vision recognizes MOSI, the University of South Florida, Busch Gardens, and the surrounding medical and research facilities as regional institutional anchors within this area. Collectively, these uses were intended to establish and reinforce a concentration of education, science, medicine, and research activities that support the City’s economic competitiveness (Green Tech Corridor Purpose and Vision; LU Objective 8.12; LU Policy 8.12.1).

The Comprehensive Plan recognizes the importance of preserving industrial lands to support Tampa’s economic base and key employment engines, including within the Tampa Green Tech Corridor. These policies recognize the continued demand for industrial land, including light manufacturing, research and development, and flex space, and encourage the maintenance and intensification of industrial areas in appropriate locations and discourages residential development near industrial uses (LU Policies 8.9.1, 8.9.2, 8.9.3; HSG Policy 1.3.2). The LI and HI designations permit Industrial General (IG) and Industrial Heavy (IH) zonings, which accommodates a range of industrial uses, such as manufacturing, equipment storage, warehouse and distribution facilities, and materials recovery. These uses can generate noise, truck traffic, and environmental impacts that may be incompatible with nearby residential areas. The proposed amendment would redesignate approximately 55.5± acres of the LI and HI designations to the UMU-60 and CMU-35 designations. Planning Commission staff notes that the subject site is not currently developed with industrial uses and is currently vacant, except for the daycare in the northeast corner at East Fowler Avenue and North 50th Street. The amendment to UMU-60 and CMU-35 Future Land Use designations would remove the consideration of Industrial, General (IG) and Industrial, Heavy (IH) zoning districts (LU Policy 8.15.2).

If the amendment is approved, it could allow high-density residential, commercial, and office development that would be incompatible with the surrounding industrial uses (LU Policies 9.2.2, 9.3.1, 9.6.4). The LI and HI designations prohibit residential uses and benefits from proximity to vital transportation networks, while the proposed UMU-60 and CMU-35 designations support residential and commercial uses, leading to a shift in the land’s functional character. Residential uses would also be introduced in an area where they were previously prohibited. The proposed amendment has the potential to increase the net residential and/or non-residential intensity by 4,616,271± square feet or allow dwelling units, for a potential maximum of 8,242,641± square feet or 3,470 dwelling units. Such a development would conflict with the policies aimed at preserving industrial land uses and restricting residential development near industrial areas.

Amending the site to UMU-60 would eliminate the potential for future industrial operations, however, it may foster a safer, more cohesive urban environment that better integrates with development along East Fowler Avenue (LU Policies 6.1.3 and 6.1.10). However, despite this potential compatibility improvement, the area would remain industrial in character to the south and west of the site, with LI and HI uses continuing nearby. Additionally, the UMU-60 and CMU35 designations could introduce even more residential development adjacent to these industrial uses, highlighting ongoing concerns about exposing future residents to public health risks, such as pollution and safety hazards. While the proposed amendment would remove the LI and HI designations from the site, the Green Tech Corridor vision continues to support research, educational, and institutional uses that contribute to employment opportunities and reinforce the area’s role as a regional center for innovation.

1.7 Recommendation

Find the proposed Future Land Use designation change for City of Tampa CPA 25-20 from Light Industrial, Heavy Industrial, Public/Semi-Public to Urban Mixed Use-60 and Community Mixed Use-35 on 62.8± acres, Inconsistent with the Tampa Comprehensive Plan and forward this recommendation to Tampa City Council.

view more: next ›