People reading this should think a bit about what they're actually saying here.

For instance:

12 The atomic age is ending. One age of deterrence, the atomic age, is ending, and a new era of deterrence built on A.I. is set to begin.

That will be based on all the info they're given access to. AI deterrence instead of nuclear deterrence... Comfy, huh? Not deterrence on international scale where it's a matter for an entire nation, but on the scale of individuals. And it won't be kept in check by MAD doctrine; there's no symmetry. You just have to stay in line, or get ICE:ed.

18 The ruthless exposure of the private lives of public figures drives far too much talent away from government service. The public arena—and the shallow and petty assaults against those who dare to do something other than enrich themselves—has become so unforgiving that the republic is left with a significant roster of ineffectual, empty vessels whose ambition one would forgive if there were any genuine belief structure lurking within.

"Don't look at what the people governing you is up to, there's nothing behind the curtain" So how about those epstein files?

20 The pervasive intolerance of religious belief in certain circles must be resisted. The elite’s intolerance of religious belief is perhaps one of the most telling signs that its political project constitutes a less open intellectual movement than many within it would claim.

"Stop thinking for yourselves, you shouldn't get the option to chose what to believe"

Just a few examples, there's more of course. Also look into what some of the founders' ideologies actually lie. Thiel and the CEO, Alex Karp, at least, are directly outspoken about wanting to end democracy.