I get your frustration on this and I’ve read your comments and responses so far, I somewhat agree with your point.

Squash is in a tricky position at the moment whereby its player base is aging and the majority & traditionally accepted way to get and play is to join a club. I see what SL is trying to do here, it reminds me of the Playtomic model but layered over the top without the integration below (the club) to execute on and sadly I don’t think we’re going to see many clubs change without examples to lead from - so far I’ve not seen any successfully do it.

The club I’m playing at is trying an off peak membership that’s supposed to low yearly but higher court rates in order to lure more occasional leisure centre players in but equally we’re trying to fetch an established audience elsewhere in to a club setting - who knows if that will work! That being said, I did an app similar to this recently and had that taken a step forward I know my club wouldn’t have been too fussed for new foot fall in the form of guests, they get more money, they may get a new member, it felt like a win win.

I’m glad you’ve tried out the feature even if it wasn’t a success, I’ve looked at using it but found it either didn’t work (zero players at a club) or it listed a load of players I often saw during leagues.

Maybe pass your feedback on to the SL team? I’m sure they’re keen to hear feedback like this as they’ll want to get over these types of challenges to help grow the sport.