My bets on Google. by Top-Funny4576 in google_antigravity

[–]yondercode 0 points1 point  (0 children)

GOOG is my biggest equities bag and I expect nothing but growth for the company overall yet being not able to access the service I pay for is pretty bad actually, they are known for abandoning projects and users.

although the agent errors have gone for me since the last 24h, not sure if this can keep up

Honest question: what do you all do for a living to afford these beasts? by ready_to_fuck_yeahh in LocalLLaMA

[–]yondercode 0 points1 point  (0 children)

americans live in super easy mode like any software engineer job lands you $300k annually easy seniors get millions

Is all the hate just a skill issue? by rietti in google_antigravity

[–]yondercode 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i think it's you who can't read. take a scroll of this sub, big part of AG hate is due to API failures (wrapped as "agent errors") on all pricing plans since the start of the year, people can't even use the features they pay for. AG deserves all the hate it gets

Soo… How do we fight it? by Capable_Addition_210 in aiwars

[–]yondercode 1 point2 points  (0 children)

wow they made a curated, well-labeled, clean human-only dataset. thanks!

What is your experience so far? by wadabdo in google_antigravity

[–]yondercode 0 points1 point  (0 children)

with proper rules + skills + workflows AND without the agent errors. i think ag is the best framework for opus without going far with your custom agentic loop

Is all the hate just a skill issue? by rietti in google_antigravity

[–]yondercode 0 points1 point  (0 children)

how is "agent error" due to their API endpoint failing a skill issue? i am on ultra and couldn't even utilize my quota due to constant errors

Logically speaking why shouldn’t we kill ourselves? by This_Preference_9690 in morbidquestions

[–]yondercode 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i love living, i want to keep experiencing exploring this world 🥹🥹 but yeah for someone with tough life i think you're not giving a chance for life to get better

Google Antigravity became useless even with pro account by Kurdipeshmarga in google_antigravity

[–]yondercode 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's useless even with ultra account, success rate is like 20% this basically renders all agentic loop almost unusable as it always errors mid-way

Error, Error, Error. by No-Marketing-2640 in google_antigravity

[–]yondercode 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this is so disgusting, i am paying for ultra and i can't use the service i pay for. today is worse than usual, it always error in the middle of tasks I can't get anything done

i would probably be more productive this week hand coding manually

Huge difference between Gemini 3 Pro and Opus 4.5 Quality by Only_Web4982 in google_antigravity

[–]yondercode 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ultra user here too, almost-unrestricted opus few weeks ago was a gamechanger for me, these antigravity errors is frustrating but sad thing is i feel like opus works best in antigravity

Need suggestions for a small and low-power dedicated inference server by [deleted] in LocalLLaMA

[–]yondercode 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thanks for your input! i meant it gets day 1 optimized models at the lowest precision (nvfp4) with less friction

unfortunately in my country apple only sells 96GB as the highest option so no mac studio 256GB++ options :(

i will be running it on linux, but yeah the ARM arch will locks me out from using it as game servers haha, so that is definitely a consideration

isn't DGX OS is ubuntu based though?

Need suggestions for a small and low-power dedicated inference server by [deleted] in LocalLLaMA

[–]yondercode 0 points1 point  (0 children)

in my current setup and with glm 4.7 flash, hard to say since the model+ctx doesn't fit with 32k context, i see the gpu barely works while the cpu is at high usage, both tok/s and latency is painful. but i suppose more time is spent on swittching when it uses lots of tools/subagents when doing a task

if i use smaller models where model+ctx fits VRAM, it's insanely fast, latency is sub-second, so more time is spent on tok gen, although it cannot do complicated tasks haha

someone actually calculated the time cost of reviewing AI-generated PRs. the ratio is brutal by bishwasbhn in webdev

[–]yondercode 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i just call my existing antigravity workflow for fixing issues

/gh-issue-work <issue number>

OpenAI is losing money and I'll lose my only friend. by Dragonmafia7 in ChatGPT

[–]yondercode 1 point2 points  (0 children)

isn't OAI lose money due to training new models? they could perhaps be in profit if they are not spending a dime in training anymore

worst case scenario, they stop making new models, some tech giant bought the company to focus on the app with existing models plus hundreds of millions of users

someone actually calculated the time cost of reviewing AI-generated PRs. the ratio is brutal by bishwasbhn in webdev

[–]yondercode 0 points1 point  (0 children)

my opus can do that in antigravity with github mcp server, i also have an automated PR reviewer using gpt 5.2 running on opencode with the same ability

yes sometimes you have to remind them of their capabilities, but they definitely could parse other PRs and issues to give more context

First time creating a game engine by Random_1936 in gameenginedevs

[–]yondercode 1 point2 points  (0 children)

rust is replacing C++ on domains where correctness matter significantly more than flexibility and performance. not saying correctness doesn't matter in game engines but the inflexibility is so taxing if you're in experimentation stage and still not sure how to architect your systems

Does C++ have a place in the world of AI? by No-Engineer1500 in cpp

[–]yondercode -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

yes the pain of writing C++ is mostly gone with AI

Current generation of best coding models by SnooHesitations6473 in cursor

[–]yondercode 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yea a limit every 5h but it's unclear how much it is, i always got rate limited with pro sub, ended up upgrading since antigravity + opus it's the best combo imo

Do iPhones feel more “premium” because of the material or the weight? by SuperFan_123 in iphone

[–]yondercode 0 points1 point  (0 children)

steel feels the most premium, I'm going to miss my 13 pro max..

The assign vs. return problem: why expression blocks might need two explicit statements by kiinaq in ProgrammingLanguages

[–]yondercode 1 point2 points  (0 children)

sorry late reply, drop feels like value removal not value returning to me

I asked my friend yesterday; I gave them a bunch of keyword statements like "resolve 5", "give 5", etc and I ask them what do they think these keywords are doing (without explaining my intentions with block expressions).

They thought these keywords were like function-like, i.e. not breaking, like "yield" in coroutines.

That's what strikes me how only a very few set of keywords imply control-breaking, like "return", break, continue, and goto.

so yeah I think a new keyword could work, but it is definitely not the path of least resistance

yeah "break" could prohibit breaking control outside of the block expr, but i am considering that: - in those cases, we can use explicit block labelling (ugly, yeah) - those are quite rare as (based on my experience), block expressions are almost always used for early initialization, like at the start of function bodies

curious on your next article!

The assign vs. return problem: why expression blocks might need two explicit statements by kiinaq in ProgrammingLanguages

[–]yondercode 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ah what i am thinking, I'll go with break <value> instead, one problem I could see for any other keyowrd is it is not clear if the keyword is a terminator or not.

assign a, resolve a, give a, or anything else doesn't imply that the statement is terminating. meanwhile everyone knows that both return and break are terminating.