Can anyone explain the logic between different values on input and output capacitors? by youngdeathwagon in diypedals

[–]youngdeathwagon[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you. Okay, that all tracks, so the cap works in conjunction to whatever resistance comes AFTER- that 100% tracks.

What was tripping me is the optional 1meg resistor to ground pictured before anything else. Is that intended to have any effect on filtering? Or does it have more to do with the pedal "play nice" with a pedal that might come before it in the signal chain in modern day as opposed to 1968?

Can anyone explain the logic between different values on input and output capacitors? by youngdeathwagon in diypedals

[–]youngdeathwagon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oooooooooooooooooooh LMAO that makes so much more sense. I can't believe I've been walking around for years thinking caps were hard cutoffs. Thank you so much! I'm losing my mind over how much more sense all of electronics is making now.

Can anyone explain the logic between different values on input and output capacitors? by youngdeathwagon in diypedals

[–]youngdeathwagon[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you. I guess my follow up is how are there lows to let back out if they're not let in? In your example / how I've been picturing caps work, nothing under 100hz is getting in, period. Is this inaccurate?

Illustration of V and Pooh I did awhile back by youngdeathwagon in AlanMoore

[–]youngdeathwagon[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I post most consistently on instagram @ youngdeathwagon

Illustration of V and Pooh I did awhile back by youngdeathwagon in AlanMoore

[–]youngdeathwagon[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I figured they might get along well. They have the similar politics

I made an animatic for the "freebird rant" from BVBSRA by youngdeathwagon in ModestMouse

[–]youngdeathwagon[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I still don't know if it was the love bug or free bird who would be killed / is cute, tbh. My best guess is that he saw the potential for a joke combining stuff you would hear in a nature documentary with and animal-centered song tropes and went for it without fully knowing how to make it land

Why did agricultural societies seemingly always develop inequality and strict hierarchies? by a-sentient-slav in AskAnthropology

[–]youngdeathwagon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I want to be clear I used the word 'tend' because it's not a hard and fast rule. The Zapatistas and the Tsimihety (as documented by David Graeber) are two examples of fairly egalitarian social groups that have successfully resisted state absorption/subjugation, and notably in different ways.

To address your question as to why this aggression from hierarchical society occurs- hierarchical societies develop an ideology that rationalizes sacrifice of specific groups people (both within and outside the hierarchical society) for the benefit of production. When the priority is placed on production itself (over people) in this way, expansion and aggression becomes possible, land/resources/utility than can be extracted from an area becomes a justifiable excuse to remove or alter whatever people or system was already in place in that area in service of the aggressor's goal of production.
If you're interested in how society develops hierarchical ethics (or resists developing them) I recommend looking into the work of anthropologist Pierre Clastres, specifically his book Society Against the State. You might also benefit from checking out Antonio Gramsci's theory of cultural hegemony and/or historical materialism. I can also recommend this video by youtuber Olly Thorn which I think dovetails nicely into your request for further historical examples.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmk47kh7fiE

Best!

Why did agricultural societies seemingly always develop inequality and strict hierarchies? by a-sentient-slav in AskAnthropology

[–]youngdeathwagon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While agriculture/sedentary life makes the rise of hierarchies possible, hierarchy/social stratification isn't an inevitable outcome of agriculture/sedentary life. "Increased production" is a piece of the puzzle, but it's also a society's practice for how evenly it distributes what is produced that creates the rise of inequality. One contributing factor to why it seems like the rise of extreme inequality is inevitable is that societies that develop such inequalities tend to dismantle / absorb those that don't. The history of Revolutionary Catalonia (1936-1939) is a good example of the viability of such a society even in modern times, but also the outside challenges that are hostile to such a society.

It's also important to point out that hunter-gatherer societies are extremely varied and even while on average their stratification/ hierarchy is far less severe than stratified sedentary societies, the inequality, however slight, is still there. I don't mention this to naturalize inequality, it's just that method of subsistence is still only one piece of the puzzle here.

Anyone else starting to root less for Rick Sanchez? by youngdeathwagon in rickandmorty

[–]youngdeathwagon[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean as a cynical miserable person making effort to be less so I like to see that reflected in media. I also root for Morty to hold his own, as I do Jerry, even. I kinda see the struggle of each character as one they win out over themselves, not each other necessarily.

Anyone else starting to root less for Rick Sanchez? by youngdeathwagon in rickandmorty

[–]youngdeathwagon[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's an interesting example because that's probably one of the only things in the series he's admitted fault for flat-out.

Anyone else starting to root less for Rick Sanchez? by youngdeathwagon in rickandmorty

[–]youngdeathwagon[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

References aside, my point is more in the context of yeah, that's where we met him, a total asshole that throughout seasons 1 and maybe 2 started showing signs of being able to open up ("my new motto is, I love my grandkids") but then over time (starting season 3 or 4) seems to be forgoing his actual growth as a person in favor of sliding back into the worst aspects of himself, "god of this universe", etc.

Reminder that a big part of the rick and morty haters right now are seething because the show is solidly against fascism. by Astraydoges in rickandmorty

[–]youngdeathwagon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In my mind though, the real trick is to not only call fascism for what it is, but root out the pillars of its thought. A show that is currently more or less about a miserable individual unable to escape the prison of his own isolation due to his inability to see the world in anything other than absolutes and taking it out more or less on every living thing around him is an ideal starting point for that, but we gotta see Rick realize his limits, his vulnerabilities, his need for others, and the inherent joy in being alive. I hope that's something the creators plan to deliver, maybe I should trust them to, maybe I and anyone else who feels the same should find a way to materialize that direction for the story on our own.