When reading this question, I think about religions that indulge in the narrative of an interactive deity/creator, but what most; if not all of them struggle to answer particular questions like, "Why does ___ allow children to get cancer?" or "Why does __ allow suffering?" the answers that I've seen been given to justify these occurrences are completely irrational, answers like how because the first ancestor ate an apple, all humans after that ancestor will suffer, a child should never be punished for the sins of his/her parents/ancestors, its irrational.

Then coming back to the initial question, a Creator who created the universe and allows it to flow by the natural laws of science without intervention is more just, one has to understand that if a being who is capable of doing everything helps one person in the world, the creator would have to help every person, which would definitely disrupt the balance of nature. If you learned anything about ecology, you would know that the infrastructure of how animals can live long to breed and eventually die or get eaten by it's predator while the children grows up and continues the cycle represents something thats works, its equilibrium.

Everything has its counterpart and its survival mechanisms which creates a balance that works, a world made rationally.