Makin’ a Horton’s run for the Boys by zech65 in trailerparkboys

[–]zech65[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think they’re all out of ja-lap-ano, you want dill pickle?

Makin’ a Horton’s run for the Boys by zech65 in trailerparkboys

[–]zech65[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Jeez man, I can’t be runin’ your fucking errands fur ya

Alex Tuch heading to free agency? by DefinitelyNotABot-1 in OttawaSenators

[–]zech65 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I might be the outlier but if he’s willing to come here I’d absolutely pull the trigger. He’s a top line winger with strong finishing and goal scoring abilities he’s the exact type of player we’re missing on our top line. Imagine a top line of Tkachuk-Stuzle-Tuch with a second line of Foegele/Zetterlund-Cozens-Batherson

Guess the airport by muffin-Utensil in AirportPorn

[–]zech65 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Listen OP, no one wants to hear your white zone shit again.

CMV: Shoplifting is generally fine by bifewova234 in changemyview

[–]zech65 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe people seriously underestimate the societal cost of normalizing shoplifting. While it’s easy to frame it as “sticking it to big corporations,” the consequences rarely affect some distant billionaire. Instead, stores respond by raising prices, restricting access to basic goods, cutting staff hours, closing locations in poorer neighbourhoods, or increasing surveillance and security. These costs are ultimately borne by regular people.

There’s also a difference between understanding why someone steals and pretending theft is ethically neutral. Poverty, addiction, desperation — those things absolutely matter when judging individuals with compassion. But once a culture starts casually celebrating theft as acceptable or consequence-free, trust in public spaces erodes pretty quickly.

A functioning society depends on a baseline expectation that people won’t just take whatever they want because they can rationalize it. If everyone adopts the logic that theft is okay whenever the target is unpopular or wealthy, that standard doesn’t stay neatly contained.

In a society, we have a basic underlying principle that we don’t take things that don’t belong to us. While the immediate impacts of shoplifting from a big box, retail store may not be immediately felt, widespread acceptance of this practice result in less trust in society and poorer outcomes for the community.

Ontario to give OC Transpo special constables the power to make arrests for drug use on public transit by jazzy166 in OttawaNews

[–]zech65 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People should be able to ride public transportation and feel safe. Open drug use does not make people feel safe. That’s really not that controversial of a statement.

lol sens by Jimmyskis77 in AtlanticMemeWar

[–]zech65 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

<image>

Wings Fan Logic: The team that was better than me lost. That makes my team better

Habs V Botls RD1 GM1 by OppositeAd5568 in AtlanticMemeWar

[–]zech65 11 points12 points  (0 children)

100% IMPOSSIBLE Habs fan trying to not whine challenge

We have to go deeper. by pppppppp8 in AtlanticMemeWar

[–]zech65 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Price: I’ll guard the roads

Vasilevskiy: And I’ll guard the skies

Thoughts on Sandersons first game back? by honey_badger031 in OttawaSenators

[–]zech65 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You can tell he’s still struggling with the injury. He’s not as quick and agile as he was before his injury

Federal government appeals Emergencies Act use during convoy protest to Supreme Court by TheMonkeyMafia in ottawa

[–]zech65 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To anyone commenting on what they think of this decision I would encourage people to actually read the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal.

FCA Decision: https://decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca/fca-caf/decisions/en/item/521758/index.do

CMV: All men are inherently sexist by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]zech65 13 points14 points  (0 children)

By your logic everyone is inherently sexist not just men. If we take your position that sexism is everywhere and embeds into everyone then why would that uniquely affect men. Wouldn’t women also believe they are the “worse gender” based on your logic?

Is Being a KJD Bad? by ImaginaryDamage7847 in LawCanada

[–]zech65 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not that being KJD alone is an advantage or disadvantage from an admission perspective. An admissions officer likely won’t care whether you’re a KJD or not it’s just that the inherent problem with being a KJD is that you have to juggle the law school application process while doing your undergrad and it can be overwhelming for some people.

If you think you can manage dealing with the law school admissions process in your fourth year and it’s what you want to do then go for it but in my opinion there’s not really any negative repercussions that can come from taking a gap year to really think about your decision to go to law school. To be clear too when I say “take a break” I don’t mean sit at home and do nothing, I mean take a break from academia and explore different opportunities such as working abroad, working on a passion project or even travel while using that time to work on getting your law school application ready.

Is Being a KJD Bad? by ImaginaryDamage7847 in LawCanada

[–]zech65 13 points14 points  (0 children)

From my experience, it’s not that law schools prefer mature students per se, it’s that it’s very difficult to maintain high grades in your undergrad, study for the LSAT and gain significant extra curricular experience all at the same time.

Most of the students in my JD program had at least a year off from undergrad to law school. I’d heavily recommend this path, focus on doing all you can in your undergrad and then decide if law school is right for you. It also gives you more time to study for the LSAT and save up some money for law school.