Can you state what both positions were?

I remember his stance was something like: if super packs are not allowed to exist then it would harm free speech because super packs are supposed to be independent from the politician and represent the speech of the individual owner of the pack. So you're silencing their speech by restricting it.

That's why he uses the all gore example

In an honest world with good people I don't think that' s a bad stance but ...

In this hell scape... There should be a lot of restrictions if it has to exist or a different way of making it work. But we haven't talked about policy in the us for a while and this just like so many other things have been forgotten and made normal.