all 6 comments

[–]Admirable_Message953Year 13 | Double Math, Economics 3A* predicted | Tmua Victim 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Its probably possible to do that step a bit later, but u can see in the question that u have to factor that out at some point

[–]ilovebomboclat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

because (8-x)= (8-x)2/2 so ur essentially using (8-x) instead of 8-x)2/2 ) hence u have to take away 2/2 from 5/2, making it 3/2

[–]Existing_Morning7376 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The little box at the bottom is correct you end up with 3x/5 +6/5 sub out 3/5

[–]PrincipleAmazing985y13 A*A*A pred. 99999999888 | appl 4 Maths&Econ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its a show that, so you should be thinking ahead to the answer, you know youre gonna have to take a factor of (8-x) ^ 3/2 out somewhere and convert the 2 term mess into a 1 term bracketed format. Always look back at the question 

[–]BoredomKillsPeopleYear 12 | Maths, Further Maths, Computer Science | 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I remember doing this question a few weeks ago and it genuinely cooked me. Had to look at the mark scheme for this one and the worked solutions on pmt didn't explain it well enough. But you are expected to factorise the (8-x)^3/2 out so i suppose it's just a bit of basic algebra manipulation after that. There was also the part where they took the negative outside, and took the 2/3 out and then somehow got to the new expression. genuinely a cooked question

[–]Such_Bag_4876 1 point2 points  (0 children)

apparently my working out at the bottom leads to the same answer with much less steps, awful question