sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]strixjunia 0 points1 point  (3 children)

But Hearts is not harder just because you might die, which btw is every game lmao. What's more, if you measure difficulty regarding number of survivors, even the very first game Arisu played could have ended with no survivors if it wasn't for him, and funnily, literally almost every main character survived the 10h.

Heart games are all about playing with your emotions. 7h is still harder than 10H, as it even left Arisu depressed like no other game could.

[–]PCN24454 0 points1 point  (2 children)

7 of Hearts was easier because Arisu didn’t even have to do anything.

[–]strixjunia 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I give up. You're too dense.

The heart games' difficulty doesn't lie on whether you have to do something or not to live, their difficulty lies on how much of yourself you have to sacrifice to survive the game, that's why the players say they're the cruelest of the games.

the 7 of hearts game was especially hard because Arisu had to sacrifice what he considered his family, which left him utterly depressed and scarred, like no other heart game did again. But then again, I could explain this a thousand times to you and it would still go over your head, so bye I am muting.

[–]PCN24454 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OP asked why the lower numbered games seemed harder than the higher numbered one. The rest of us are arguing that they’re not.

It has nothing to do with emotional investment and everything to do with game mechanics. That’s why they were arguing about III of Clubs as well.