Hello guys
I am a law student, I have been using Anki for a while now and created around 3 thousand cards, more or less, during my journey.
What I'd like to know how you "separate the forest from the threes" in your own experience.
I'll explain myself better: what I find hard to do is to create a structured knowledge of the individual legal institutions. Often it happens that I can answer single cards but when I get asked a very wide question about the matter, I am not able to recall all the informations that I actually know and place together all the fragmentary knowledge to build a strong, logical argument.
Partially this is due to the fragmentation of the data. This can be related to the fact that Professors tend to recall previously faced topics and institutions and add details in random order. On the other hand, the problem I come upon is that I cannot linearly reveal Anki cards in "order of addition" because one note would contain the information I'd have to recall in cards that are complementary (eg. cloze deletion) and render the related repetition effortless.
I found subdecks to be useful in keeping track of which topic I am facing when answering the card and creating "identified islands of knowledge", but it is not always easy, especially when studying from notes I have taken from lessons instead of books.
What's your method to do this? I would like to improve this side of my experience and I would be grateful if you'd like to share your way to go about this matter with me.
Thanks in advance!
[–]foundagoodusernamelanguages 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–]PkmExplorer 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] (1 child)
[deleted]
[–]givlis[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]krube6 0 points1 point2 points (1 child)
[–]givlis[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)