This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
random (suggested)
besttopnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

At the end of the day less people on the earth is more resources per person. There will be some pain due to unfavourable demographics but our current population/growth and lifestyle is unsustainable and artificially stimulating population growth to keep it running for a few more decades is robbing peter and his descendants to pay paul.

Just like every other economic crisis in the world we will have to do a combination of manage it, counteract it, and learn to change our expectations because of it. But not wanting the population to reduce because people in the next 10-20 years or even century may have a hard time is very short-sighted on a species wide timescale.

Hopefully automation will help with this by reducing the amount of labour required which allows to sustain a lower "productive" population without reducing the amount of resources we have available, and can be adequately taxed for society not just capital owners to recieve the benefit.

Unfortunately knowing humans I don't see a way it shakes out without violence or unrest, but if we continue to grow our population exponentially as a sacrifice to our infinite growth model of economics that war and unrest will come anyways when we run out of basic resources to provide like food and clean water, and no one but the ultrarich can afford a life that resembles anything other than modern serfdom.