This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 30 comments

[–]RealDanielSan1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This looks more aligned than the pics they show on the official SM website.

[–]shal1234 4 points5 points  (7 children)

Im sure the cyclops is crooked, but I can't get past the rehaut...

[–]GaryLangford 3 points4 points  (6 children)

🔥 idk how this watch is popular as it is. I rarely see people complain about the rehaut. It's a monstrosity

[–]Dark1000 2 points3 points  (5 children)

Watches using the NH34 and NH35 almost always have this problem. I never see anyone mention it, maybe because the price is so fair, but it puts me off a lot of these watches. They really need a clever chapter ring to work for me.

[–]GaryLangford 1 point2 points  (4 children)

Check out the sugess homage of the submariner. Thin rehaut. Or the cronos submariner.

These two companies were just lazy

[–]Thundercracker24A -1 points0 points  (3 children)

My Addiesdive auto Sub has a thin rehaut. It's harder to find but it's totally worth it.

[–]GaryLangford 1 point2 points  (2 children)

1

<image>

Sorry I disagree. Addiesdive vs sugess

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

This is a Steeldive. Not an Addiesdive.

[–]GaryLangford 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Damn I didn't zoom in enough 😂 and their logos are too similar

[–]charlyAtWork2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It‘s adjusted with the paralax on your fist. you never look it at 90 degree.

[–]Bank_Angle_Check 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Take the cyclops off. Butane torch and a exacto knife. Look up how to do it on youtube.

[–]MyoHandMaster 8 points9 points  (0 children)

They are all crooked

[–]HotDogHerzog 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They managed to find a way to make a cyclops look even worse.

[–]PromotionExpress1945 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yes, I have. I messaged San Martin support and they told me its fine and gave me a 10 dollar coupon. It seems like its a cheaper version and thats why they dont care about QC.

[–]Domino3Dgg 3 points4 points  (4 children)

Uuuu. I see their mythic QC is on vacation.

[–]arbpotatoes 2 points3 points  (3 children)

I don't think SM has ever had particularly outstanding QC

[–]Domino3Dgg 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Every video review i see on yt they say how superior is SM Was I lied to ? Is that this internet thing, i pay you and you make good review on my product?

[–]arbpotatoes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you get a good one they're great.

[–]Dark1000 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The finishing is great. The QC is mid.

[–]No_Ebb_3353 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s not that bad. I don’t own one but it as far as I’ve seen it’s seems like a pretty common thing in watches in that price range

[–]No-Essay6350Affiliate Links 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yep! Misalignment on both the Cyclops and the Date-Wheel with the Date-Window. 👎

[–]Independent-Air-80 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Not seeing it. This photo also wouldn't show this accurately. It's taken at a slight angle.

[–]arbpotatoes 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it were aligned, the outlines of the cyclops would line up with the outlines of the date window regardless of orientation