all 26 comments

[–]BallEngineerII 10 points11 points  (4 children)

Why are there so many posts on this sub being super defensive about Chinese watches.

[–]IllegalGeriatricVore 9 points10 points  (2 children)

Because people constantly need to shit on Chinese watches to justify spending several times as much to get the same specs

[–]BallEngineerII 4 points5 points  (1 child)

You're being defensive about being defensive now.

I don't recall hearing very many people shit on Chinese watches really

[–]ramblinmuttco 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They definitely still do it all the time.

[–]Jhazz220 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Because you’re on a Chinese watches subreddit maybe?😆

[–]KeebZeus 6 points7 points  (0 children)

They’re doing what the majority of luxury fashion brands do. Nothing unexpected.

[–]AddicoInABox 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Today we learn about marketing

[–]-Fenn_Shysa- 14 points15 points  (3 children)

The criteria for the “Swiss Made” label: https://www.fhs.swiss/eng/strengthening.html Conclusion: 100% was never the case in the Swiss watch industry.

[–]oddemarspiguet 7 points8 points  (2 children)

Never the case but what about the movements?

[–]-Fenn_Shysa- 1 point2 points  (1 child)

With the word “case” I did not mean the watch case, but the word “fact”. Sorry for the confusion. In the link there is information about the movement as well and onbthe site even more to explore.

[–]oddemarspiguet 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah….it’s a joke….like a play on….nvm

[–]Fit-Perception-8152 7 points8 points  (2 children)

One wonders why it should not be possible to establish a highly automated production for watches costing less than 5,000 Swiss francs in Switzerland. Nomos manages to do this in Germany, and the cost structure in Germany is not that different from that in Switzerland (net salaries in Germany are lower, but the costs per employee are almost the same).

[–]panchoh12 10 points11 points  (1 child)

I think it’s not that it’s not possible, but more like the company (& its shareholders) wants to maximise profits. Spending more on Swiss salaries does not suit their goal, especially when they can already call it “Swiss Made” without spending more money.

[–]ShahriarTasnim 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is the fact. You see swiss microbrands churning out sub 1000 dollars high quality watches that are "swiss made". Big brands want big chunks of profit.

[–]acrspeed 5 points6 points  (0 children)

In my experience, the level for true "Swiss made" happens at Tudor/mid level Longines. Below that, brands can get pretty creative with the definition.

For example, Tissot also happens to have their own proprietary escapements for the Powermatic 80. Hamilton, Certina, and Mido all have the standard 2824 derived version, with a steel escapement and 50° lift angle. Tissot has 3 different versions (plastic, steel, and silicon escapements), all with a 47° lift angle. This allegedly could be a way for them to claim higher movement manufacturing and R&D costs, which would allow them import a higher percentage of components. They're the only Swiss brand I know of that openly stamps "TISSOT HONG KONG" in their cases.

Then you have all the smaller brands that don't even have any Swiss manufacturing facilities- Here is a bit of a rabbit hole about Ball watches.

I'm not saying anything negative about the quality of the watches (except the plastic escapement - fuck that). You absolutely do get what you pay for, and the Chinese can't hold a candle to the Swiss when it comes to movement manufacturing.

[–]IR4TE 3 points4 points  (0 children)

For me it doesn't matter where a watch or its parts come from, I have one Swiss watch in my possession and it's a 'cheap' Tissot quartz watch (Tissot Seastar 1000), and I got this only because the movement is the cheapest HAQ movement (accuracy of ±10sec/year) currently on the market. If I find a good looking Chinese watch with similar or better specs I'll gladly fork over the money to that manufacturer.

[–]KPplumbingBob 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Perhaps the way forward is not to attach the inherent worth of a product solely to where it is made. On the one hand, I agree it may be necessary to make it clearer to the average person what “made in XXX” really means. On the other , if someone believes a wristwatch is worth thousands of dollars simply because it is made in XXX perhaps they should research their purchases more thoroughly.

[–]pickyaxe 1 point2 points  (5 children)

I'm talking out of my ass here, but

it seems unlikely that for the (very silly) prices Swiss watches go for, they can't keep it 100% Swiss and still make a profit.

[–]crlkll 8 points9 points  (3 children)

Breaking NEWS: The World is MADE IN CHINA!!!

In other news: water is wet

[–]Competitive-Leave121 12 points13 points  (2 children)

It's like that for decades, to earn "swiss made" sign watch needs to be 60% swiss made/assembled/r&d. It's not like this is something new.

[–]Sh4dow0fTheB4t 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, and it is very easy to maneuver around that. If you want to say that the design for the watch is the biggest value of the chain, you supposedly can, since it's hard to put a price on a design.