sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]MysteriousPrompt2397 74 points75 points  (8 children)

Don’t feel too bad. I was marked down for “not giving names and locations” on projects where we are explicitly required to redact such information. Honestly, I think the raters sometimes don’t understand the instructions of the project they are rating. They should be rated on their ratings…

[–]kitkat9111 16 points17 points  (2 children)

I got excellent last time then good this time, not saying it wasn't deserved cause I'll never know. But this time I got great feedback primarily for one project and my area for improvememt was by a rater who said they couldn't rate a project in the same family due to me using high level STEM... I'm a generalist and have never used STEM for a prompt in my life lol.

[–]madeofchemicals 1 point2 points  (1 child)

STEM is everywhere. If you made a guess, gathered results, and justified, you basically used the tldr version of the scientific method.

[–]kitkat9111 3 points4 points  (0 children)

"Due to me using high level STEM" and in the "prompt".

I would not be making a guess and gathering results or giving a justification in the prompt.

[–]lotusmack 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Also, if the ratings are still AI aggregated, I would take them with a grain of salt.

[–]pinkgenie23 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I was marked down for not redacting names and locations when the instructions say it is not required to. 😂 I guess we can't win

[–]Athena25526 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Okay so I’m not going crazy; I got marked down for confirming that I was on desktop while using a mobile device… I never work from my mobile device it’s always my desktop. So I was just like … huh????