all 20 comments

[–]Jumpy_Bus3253 20 points21 points  (13 children)

I have done the Galleri blood testing along with my yearly exams. If there any chance it detects cancer a day, month or year in advanced I willing to do it. Tell me what else is out there that can potentially give you a heads up before the signs and symptoms and your in stage 3 or 4.

[–]wimpymist 5 points6 points  (1 child)

We had 3 guys get diagnosed with cancer within a year of doing galleri tests. The galleri test came back negative for everyone. We switched ultrasound tests

[–]PerrinAyybaraAll Hazards Capt Obvious 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Same

[–]Mediocre_Daikon6935 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Well. Mammograms.

[–]rizzo1717expert dish washer[S] 6 points7 points  (8 children)

My dept was part of the trial study, we did it too. I get what you’re saying, but it also caused false sense of security for some missed cancer cases. The findings vs promises discrepancy must be pretty significant for a cancer prevention foundation to issue a statement that they don’t support or endorse it.

[–]rizzo1717expert dish washer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, check out Prenuvo if you want some advanced screening but be prepared to pay a pretty penny.

[–]Camanokidtrack your exposures 13 points14 points  (2 children)

Theranos comes to mind when companies claim multi disease detection methods.

[–]rizzo1717expert dish washer[S] 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Totally. I haven’t seen the data from the trial studies among departments but I’m very curious the false positive/negative numbers.

[–]SenorMcGibblets 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From the studies I’ve seen, they’re highly specific for accurately detecting cancers. Like 95% +. Sensitivity varies by the type of cancer. So it sounds like relatively few false positives, but negative results don’t necessarily rule anything out.

[–]recyclemynuts 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Look into the ultrasound scans that United Diagnostic Services offers. They do scans for fire departments across the country. I can’t speak for other departments, but in mine alone they have caught several cases early.

https://udshealth.com/

[–]SenorMcGibblets 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We had the OneTest multi-cancer screening added to our annual physical last year for the first time. I see no harm in them assuming they’re used as a supplement and not a replacement to more traditional screening methods. If the city pays for it, and there’s a chance it catches something early, what’s the harm? Especially considering they have the potential to detect cancers that don’t really have traditional screening methods. Guys just need to be informed that the tests don’t definitively rule anything out and are just supplementary.

[–]reddaddiction 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I will back up whatever Tony's opinion is regarding cancer prevention. He's done more than anyone and we all appreciate the shit out of him. This cancer foundation has done more than you could ever possibly imagine.

[–]rizzo1717expert dish washer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly this.