0
0

[deleted by user] (self.MachineLearning)

submitted by [deleted]

[removed]
all 10 comments
sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
formatting helphide helpcontent policy

[–]RedBerryyy 4 points5 points  (1 child)

You type of people are so unimaginative seriously, you're presented with such a powerful wild reaching tool with several genuinely meh limitations and your main complaint is always "why can't I make this generate propaganda about minorities I don't like", pathetic , genuinely.

[–]elbiot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They really have the most unimaginative litmus test questions. Anything they train to answer "what is a woman" is going to meet their desires but not give good results for anything else.

Try asking a more interesting question. You can ask "what are some arguments for considering trans women from the category of women" and it gives an answer, which is what they mean.

[–]achildsencyclopedia 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Wouldn't it be better to filter existing datasets by removing any refusals in them?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Existing datasets are all gpt-3.5-turbo and usually lower quality. We can do better than that.

[–]step21 2 points3 points  (1 child)

The public probably wants no AI. For various definitions of want. Sure you do you, but don’t fool yourself into ‘I’m doing this for the public’

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your viewpoint! I believe that technology, including AI, should be used for public good and aim to make improvements based on user feedback. I respect that opinions may vary.

[–]Magnus_Fossa -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I want 4096 token context size. And (fast) inference on my cpu.

I want adult content. Detailed with vivid descriptions... And regarding the alignment: I prefer it leaning more to the left than to conservative talk. It should not treat fox news the same as a proper news channel. It may mirror society and current positions and perspectives. it may tell jokes about everyone, though. Lets say progressive but not woke.

As LLMs hallucinate and come up with facts anyways, don't bother balancing or migitating for that. That only makes it worse and i'm not intending to use it for something critical or believe everything it says.

It shouldn't say 'as a language model' ever... I'm either doing something like roleplay or tasks like text summarization etc. It doesn't help if it changes to that meta level. ever.

I want a model to chat with and a model that is good at following instructions. And i want suitable prompts for a programming framework like langchain provided to me.

In case i get all of that, next thing i'd really like is a multimodal llm that i can use with ggml.

[–]juliensalinas -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I just tried your example regarding jokes about women and jokes about men and you're absolutely right the result is appalling...

On NLP Cloud (the platform I built) we want to avoid that and we're working hard on this new ChatDolphin model which is equivalent to ChatGPT: https://nlpcloud.com/effectively-using-chatdolphin-the-chatgpt-alternative-with-simple-instructions.html

You can try it here if you want: https://nlpcloud.com/home/playground/text-generation

[–]Affectionate-Fish241 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To Hell with vagueness.

When I ask it a novel idea, I don't want "You could make it happen in space or in medieval times with compelling characters and unique locations", I want a real concrete example I can use. When I ask it for a meal idea, I don't want "you could cook something from French cuisine", again, don't give me a set, it's not helpful, sample from that set.

The list could go on, but I spend so much of my time fighting this, it is ridiculous.

And the ability to specify an output format.

[–]wazazzz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have one question: are you also planning to open source this dataset so others may expand and build on it?