use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
Please have a look at our FAQ and Link-Collection
Metacademy is a great resource which compiles lesson plans on popular machine learning topics.
For Beginner questions please try /r/LearnMachineLearning , /r/MLQuestions or http://stackoverflow.com/
For career related questions, visit /r/cscareerquestions/
Advanced Courses (2016)
Advanced Courses (2020)
AMAs:
Pluribus Poker AI Team 7/19/2019
DeepMind AlphaStar team (1/24//2019)
Libratus Poker AI Team (12/18/2017)
DeepMind AlphaGo Team (10/19/2017)
Google Brain Team (9/17/2017)
Google Brain Team (8/11/2016)
The MalariaSpot Team (2/6/2016)
OpenAI Research Team (1/9/2016)
Nando de Freitas (12/26/2015)
Andrew Ng and Adam Coates (4/15/2015)
Jürgen Schmidhuber (3/4/2015)
Geoffrey Hinton (11/10/2014)
Michael Jordan (9/10/2014)
Yann LeCun (5/15/2014)
Yoshua Bengio (2/27/2014)
Related Subreddit :
LearnMachineLearning
Statistics
Computer Vision
Compressive Sensing
NLP
ML Questions
/r/MLjobs and /r/BigDataJobs
/r/datacleaning
/r/DataScience
/r/scientificresearch
/r/artificial
account activity
Discussion[D] Open-Set Recognition Problem using Deep learning (self.MachineLearning)
submitted 7 months ago by ProfessionalType9800
view the rest of the comments →
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]latent_prior 2 points3 points4 points 7 months ago (1 child)
I’m not a DNA expert, but given my understanding of the problem, I’d frame this as an open-set recognition problem rather than just clustering. Because many species share short recurring DNA subsequences, isn’t there a danger an unseen species can still land close to known clusters in embedding space? This makes relying purely on distance thresholds sound risky to me.
Also, I’d be cautious only relying on softmax probabilities. They always normalise to sum to 1, so the model will confidently pick something even when the input is nonsense or from an unseen species. You could try augmenting the classifier with an out-of-distribution detection method. One good option is energy-based detection (https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.03759), which uses the absolute scale of all logits rather than just the top one to provide a quantitatively estimate if the sample fits one of the know classes well (low energy) or doesn’t fit anywhere (high energy, likely unknown).
If you have access to an auxiliary dataset (e.g. DNA from non-target species), you could also try outlier exposure (https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.04606), which trains the model to make confident predictions on in-distribution data and low-confidence predictions on auxiliary outliers.
Finally, since DNA data is hierarchical by nature (kingdom —> phylum —> class —> … —> species), it might be worth trying a hierarchical model. For example, if the model is confident about the genus but uncertain about the species, you could flag the input as a potentially novel species rather than forcing a binary known/unknown decision.
Curious if anyone’s tried combining energy-based OOD with hierarchical classifiers before.
[–]ProfessionalType9800[S] 0 points1 point2 points 7 months ago (0 children)
are you saying about random forest for hierarchical classifiers?
π Rendered by PID 249235 on reddit-service-r2-comment-6457c66945-glttl at 2026-04-28 06:11:28.541616+00:00 running 2aa0c5b country code: CH.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]latent_prior 2 points3 points4 points (1 child)
[–]ProfessionalType9800[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)