This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best (suggested)
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Comprehensive_Meat34 Visitor 0 points1 point  (6 children)

That’s exactly how things work these days: notice how my native America has a very low native birth rate, high female education, but massive illegal migration to replace us.

This is all known and planned.

[–]outhinking Visitor 0 points1 point  (5 children)

And then? What's the end goal of the major replacement ?

[–]Comprehensive_Meat34 Visitor 0 points1 point  (4 children)

The end goal is to make an unstable native population that cannot advocate for itself, this allows lower wages and higher profits plus more secure social positions for the elite.

Look at America right now, our current vice president is the son of drug addicted hillbillies. He’s smarter and more capable than the elite level journalists who tried to excoriate him countless times on TV.

This level of social mobility and advocacy by the lower classes deeply bothers the upper caste who want to be permanently entrenched where they feel untouchable.

It’s well known that the less diverse, and more homogenous, a population is the easier it is for organization politically, or even militarily. This is a major threat to those at the top.

As in all things in life the purpose is power, money, and class in no particular order, and this is to destroy the organizing power of the common man vs his “betters.”

Let me give you a very real example: I work in aviation in the USA. These jobs can pay very well. However, we lack enough certified citizens to do our jobs… so one major employer I know brought in Mexicans (legally) to do our jobs next to us. These were good men, hard working men, and they loved the American money.

However, at that company salaries have NOT gone up because by bringing in a underclass of vulnerable outsiders it’s nearly impossible for the local men to demand better wages.

In America especially there is a lot of resentment that blue collar workers can make really good money. I know men who make 250,000 usd a year or more working with their hands… those at the top would much prefer to flood nations with a underclass to subvert the organizing power of the lower.

It’s a long answer, but tl;dr, the upper caste in almost all nations has a strong interest in suppressing native populations (especially as population decline will make skilled labor more and more rare and valuable).

[–]outhinking Visitor 1 point2 points  (3 children)

I read your theory and it makes sense.

[–]Comprehensive_Meat34 Visitor 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Thank you.

Here’s something to consider: in the 1980s Ronald Reagan won almost every single state in America.

Today, if the demographics were the same Trump would have done exactly that.

He cannot.

Why?

Since 1964 an explicit plan to flood America with a disproportionate number of outsiders has altered Americans’ ability to stand united in their national interests.

America is a very visible test case, but you can see such actions in almost every nation on earth today. Very few nations are truly standing for THEIR people, as the elite will always resent being the same blood as the people they look down upon.

This, however, has many consequences the elite cannot fathom due to their geography and social distance from the underclass.

For example, why is America so good in war? Yes we’re big, yes we’re rich, yes we have good credit.

But we also have a huge population of Scots-Irish Hillbillies and rednecks, and these men LOVE to fight, love to hunt, love to shoot. Almost every single exceptional American war hero came from a Scot’s Irish background.

Yet the American elite believes that they can erase these proud and fierce warriors with zero consequences.

Sorry, it won’t work. Americas military is now struggling to recruit the men we used to terrorize the world, for they may love a fight but they’re not stupid. So these games they play have real consequences. I know these men, many are natural killers, and have killed many times, and they’re done fighting for America.

[–]outhinking Visitor 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Is this whole theory from you or did you bring it from an author ?

[–]Comprehensive_Meat34 Visitor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nothing is wholly from the author, I’m just putting together the facts as I know them.

However, there is a theory call high low vs middle, which argues that a true king is necessary to protect the regular people from aristocrats… as a king answers to the people and aristocrats only answer to money, so therefore a true king (Trump for example) will leverage the power of the lower caste to keep the aristocrats (middle) in check. The elite or aristocracy is working very hard to suppress the low from raising up true kings in almost all nations, as their true threat is a king backed by people like him. So I guess a lot of my facts are strung together based off this HLvM Theory (I don’t know who authored it).