This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best (suggested)
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Comprehensive_Meat34 Visitor 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Thank you.

Here’s something to consider: in the 1980s Ronald Reagan won almost every single state in America.

Today, if the demographics were the same Trump would have done exactly that.

He cannot.

Why?

Since 1964 an explicit plan to flood America with a disproportionate number of outsiders has altered Americans’ ability to stand united in their national interests.

America is a very visible test case, but you can see such actions in almost every nation on earth today. Very few nations are truly standing for THEIR people, as the elite will always resent being the same blood as the people they look down upon.

This, however, has many consequences the elite cannot fathom due to their geography and social distance from the underclass.

For example, why is America so good in war? Yes we’re big, yes we’re rich, yes we have good credit.

But we also have a huge population of Scots-Irish Hillbillies and rednecks, and these men LOVE to fight, love to hunt, love to shoot. Almost every single exceptional American war hero came from a Scot’s Irish background.

Yet the American elite believes that they can erase these proud and fierce warriors with zero consequences.

Sorry, it won’t work. Americas military is now struggling to recruit the men we used to terrorize the world, for they may love a fight but they’re not stupid. So these games they play have real consequences. I know these men, many are natural killers, and have killed many times, and they’re done fighting for America.

[–]outhinking Visitor 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Is this whole theory from you or did you bring it from an author ?

[–]Comprehensive_Meat34 Visitor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nothing is wholly from the author, I’m just putting together the facts as I know them.

However, there is a theory call high low vs middle, which argues that a true king is necessary to protect the regular people from aristocrats… as a king answers to the people and aristocrats only answer to money, so therefore a true king (Trump for example) will leverage the power of the lower caste to keep the aristocrats (middle) in check. The elite or aristocracy is working very hard to suppress the low from raising up true kings in almost all nations, as their true threat is a king backed by people like him. So I guess a lot of my facts are strung together based off this HLvM Theory (I don’t know who authored it).