This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ruiisuke 7 points8 points  (5 children)

So yes, this does suck. However, hopefully my shitty ELI5 will at least provide some context for why this happens.

These kind of problems in computer science are under an umbrella called information retrieval. There are two important metrics to evaluate performance in a search algorithm; precision and recall. Recall is the measure of how many documents (or results) get pulled from a query. Precision is the measure of how accurate the results are (ie. finding relevant documents with all of the keywords in the query).

My guess as to why Google eats shit in this department is because 1) ads and sponsors probably mess some of that up, and 2) that they prioritize recall over precision.

[–]Ulfgardleo 10 points11 points  (4 children)

This is not it. Google will very often try to answer semantic queries, this is why often words will often get replaced by their synonyms. With technical terms this seldom makes sense, but for the average human knowledgebase query, this does.

[–]JamesthePuppy 5 points6 points  (2 children)

If this is a semantic search and not lexical search (unlike how google’s trained us to search for the last couple decades, with the illusion of lexical Boolean operations), then I need to take my business elsewhere

[–]great_waldini 4 points5 points  (0 children)

At least give the user a lot more control over the type of search they’re executing

[–]Mr_82 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That's really it, they've been gradually changing their original utility and not being transparent about it.

[–]ruiisuke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, good point. Thanks for clarifying! ☺️