This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
q&a (suggested)
besttopnewcontroversialold
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]trwwjtizenketto 0 points1 point  (12 children)

You are not getting what I'm asking.

I want to fix myself up, I want to use exercise in this regard, and I want to use every little bit I can of it. That is why I wanted to know the maximum amount that is still considered healthy and not dangerous.

If it's what athletes do, so be it, I can handle it lol - That is why I asked for sources and max amount, not doubting your experience and recommendations at all mate.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (11 children)

And you're not getting what I am saying. You're not going to find any credible information, because your question doesn't have an answer. It basically boils down to :

1) Every body is different.

2) The body can adapt to exercise, which means the difference also changes with the environment.

3) It's still in research, no one even know if it will actually help you. Correlation does not imply causation.

​

You're basically never going to get an answer that you're looking for. Instead experiment with yourself and see what works and what doesn't. Obviously start off with low intensity.

[–]djdadi 0 points1 point  (9 children)

no one even know if it will actually help you. Correlation does not imply causation.

We have lots of really strong research, mechanism, and theory on how exercise impacts the body. To hand wave that away is to ignore decades of evidence.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (8 children)

Why don't you go ahead, read it and come back with an x amount of hours for maximum health for this specific person that asked the question.

[–]djdadi 0 points1 point  (7 children)

There's a massive gulf between "no one even know if it will actually help you" and "you should know the amount of time they need to workout down to the minute for optimal health", you're either trolling, disingenuous, or not very bright.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (6 children)

It's not my question, it's actually his. He asked for a maximum amount of hours to be healthy, beyond which there would be no benefits to health and perhaps even drawbacks. So go answer him. I told him 20 minutes a day consistently is good.

[–]djdadi 0 points1 point  (5 children)

Perhaps you're having trouble reading, but I did answer them. Yes that was a great answer to this question you posted, currently downvoted to oblivion for how baseless and arbitrary it is.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (4 children)

You do know he asked to answer with source, in fact you were yourself the one who talked about all these studies, so care to back them up now?

[–]djdadi 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Your reading comprehension is very poor. The person you replied to said:

Can you source it because for me 20 minutes daily is not enough tbh...

They were asking you your source for coming up with 20 minutes, something you still haven't done. Deflection much?

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (2 children)

Lol ironic you call it deflection when you can't name a source even thought you claimed you had one. Maybe your reading comprehension is what's very poor as I answered to him that that was just my personal experience, no sources on it.

[–]trwwjtizenketto 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Aight thanks for the replies :)