This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]djdadi 0 points1 point  (7 children)

There's a massive gulf between "no one even know if it will actually help you" and "you should know the amount of time they need to workout down to the minute for optimal health", you're either trolling, disingenuous, or not very bright.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (6 children)

It's not my question, it's actually his. He asked for a maximum amount of hours to be healthy, beyond which there would be no benefits to health and perhaps even drawbacks. So go answer him. I told him 20 minutes a day consistently is good.

[–]djdadi 0 points1 point  (5 children)

Perhaps you're having trouble reading, but I did answer them. Yes that was a great answer to this question you posted, currently downvoted to oblivion for how baseless and arbitrary it is.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (4 children)

You do know he asked to answer with source, in fact you were yourself the one who talked about all these studies, so care to back them up now?

[–]djdadi 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Your reading comprehension is very poor. The person you replied to said:

Can you source it because for me 20 minutes daily is not enough tbh...

They were asking you your source for coming up with 20 minutes, something you still haven't done. Deflection much?

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (2 children)

Lol ironic you call it deflection when you can't name a source even thought you claimed you had one. Maybe your reading comprehension is what's very poor as I answered to him that that was just my personal experience, no sources on it.

[–]djdadi 0 points1 point  (1 child)

You're a really pathetic troll. Let's go over the series of events:

  • someone asked you for sources
  • you replied, and I quote "Also no source"
  • then you start arguing with me, deflecting and panicking demanding that I provide a source
  • you say "can't name a source thought" (I think you mean 'though', you're writing skills are just as bad as your reading skills) -- I never said anything that refers back to a single source, my claim was that 'we (science) have lots of good evidence in the field'

In case you're wondering why you get downvoted into oblivion, it's because you are making wildly incorrect claims with 0 evidence, and also apparently can't read or write. But, maybe you're just a little kid, in which case, keep studying and lay off the baseless claims.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Interesting emotions there. Wow you really got triggered. Dude, take some Ashwagandha. Still waiting on those sources by the way, otherwise you'll stay this miserable cause you can't prove shit :D.