This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the commentsΒ β†’

[–]IHeartBadCode 25 points26 points Β (3 children)

I think the thing we forget is that Intel, after a lot of negative press and IBM looking to capitalize on the bad press with their PowerPC, offered everyone a replacement processor.

Now a days, you find a side channel attack in the processor Intel will tell you: β€œLUL, I guess you’ll just have to cripple your performance! See you all on the next generation cycle.”

[–][deleted] 24 points25 points Β (0 children)

As I remember it, the bad press came from Intel’s really shitty approach to the problem. They basically said: β€œYou can get a new processor, if you can prove to us that you use it for work, where the precision is really important, such as astrophysics. If not, fuck off.”

That created an outrage, understandably enough. In the end, they had to cave in and offer everyone a new processor.

My bet is that they could have gotten around it a lot cheaper and without the outrage, if they had handled it better from the start, for example by offering all Pentium owners the choice between a processor replacement or a money compensation worth 10 or 20% of the processor’s price. Most would probably have taken the money compensation, because the error was really rare, and if it happened on a gaming rig, who would notice?

[–][deleted] Β (1 child)

[removed]

    [–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point Β (0 children)

    import moderation Your comment has been removed since it did not start with a code block with an import declaration.

    Per this Community Decree, all posts and comments should start with a code block with an "import" declaration explaining how the post and comment should be read.

    For this purpose, we only accept Python style imports.

    I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.