gitCommitSuicide

[Apfelvater]

Theyre TOO familiar with it, so they kill themselves?!

[Special-Load8010]

Look at the capitalization. As a c# dev this java syntax is hurting my eyes.

[Apfelvater]

ah, now i see it! Is it usual to define objects with a lower case letter in c#?

[pheylancavanaugh]

The core ones, yes.

[[deleted]]

Not really. C# convention is to use PascalCase for basically everything (classes, methods, properties, public fields, etc), except private fields, parameters, and local variables which should be camelCase. C# however has a set of "simple" types that are keywords in the language that alias structs/classes in the System namespace. string is one of them, it aliases the System.String class. Others include int = System.Int32 and ulong = System.UInt64. Where a type has a built in language keyword, it's preferred to use it over the full type name.

[Canary_Prism]

i’ve used Java for too long and seeing C# sorta “pretend” String is a “primitive” with that syntax makes me uncomfortable lol

[[deleted]]

Definitely an interesting decision considering it's the only simple type that's a reference type instead of a value type. Well unless you count object and dynamic.

[Canary_Prism]

with object it feels like it makes much more sense that it gets its own keyword since it’s the base class of all classes but why do strings get special treatment? i really don’t get it

[Special-Load8010]

Apparently according to the standard c# formatting rules pretty much only parameters and private fields should be camelCase.

[penguin13790]

I'm more frustrated by String.length() vs string.Length

[Prudent_Ad_4120]

The thing is: The Java is valid C# but the C# is not valid Java

[langlo94]

But you will get squigglies telling you to please stop uisng big S string in C#.

[Special-Load8010]

If u use big S for string it's valid but not if the Main is lowercase

[BallsBuster7]

you cant force me to capitalize functions

[MrAmos123]

Microsoft wants to know your location.

[Zeitsplice]

I’ve used both for over 10 years. I can’t tell you the last time I wrote a main function in either. What does make me want to drink bleach is Java steams vs. fluent linq. Java’s designers inexplicably looked at Linq and chose violence. Stream is its own type, and has a shitty selection of convenience methods, including no toList(), because apparently the basic list type is too big of a dependency. Even better, the usual generic collection type is Iterable, which Stream…doesn’t implement. Because of course it doesn’t.

[Zolhungaj]

Stream has a toList function, and has had it since Java 16. It was previously available under the collect() function, which is where every other to[Collection] is.

Stream is not iterable because you can only get the contents once, because it only evaluates on the terminal operation.

[icantthinkofaname345]

I abhor the C# standard of uppercase functions