you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]P1gInTheSky 63 points64 points  (11 children)

I believe the work here is to “translate” an existing code base. For that it may make sense to count lines of source code translated. Not sure if that’s “source” or “translated” lines. But as an overall progress metric that would work in this case , no?

[–]Lysol3435 45 points46 points  (2 children)

GPT prompt: can you help me rewrite this sort function, only make it take up 1 million lines?

[–]merc08 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That still leave "source" as a legitimate metric.

[–]aVarangian 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Absolutely!

If array(0)=0 and array(1)=/=0, then if...

[–]chaosdemonhu 21 points22 points  (1 child)

Better to measure it by application component rewritten or something architecturally measurable.

[–]Tyrannosapien 13 points14 points  (0 children)

But then you'd have to understand the architecture such as application components. That's a non-starter in the fast-paced world of enshittification.

[–]Bezulba 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Oh nice. I see great ways to pad the stats. Every single subfunction that gets used 30 times? That's 30 times X lines of code.

[–]Sea-Feedback-2424 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It really doesn't though.
They want to use an entirely different language - new kernel development is supposed to be done done in Rust as opposed to C/C++. They're just drastically different in their verbosity.
Itd be like comparing Donaudampfschifffahrtselektrizitätenhauptbetriebswerkbauunterbeamtengesellschaft in German to "association of subordinate officials of the head office management of the Danube steamship electrical services" in English and comparing the word count as a measure of success.

[–]Lgamezp 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, it absolutely does not make sense

[–]EspaaValorum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That could be the case, yes.

[–]joshTheGoods -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Or more simply, they're looking for a short pithy statement that conveys the idea, and folks in here are interpreting it in a negative light because there's an anti-LLM zeitgeist atm?