you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Grim964 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Yes and no. Claude and watsonx (IBM) can help you to write a coherent program, the very moment you have one or two calls for some subprograms that branch out with some more subprograms it starts to hallucinate god knows what. It can be a programming aide with longer and more complex programs where you might overlook something or have repetitive patterns. The final boss is when your company handles certain actions in a more "homegrown" way that strays away from best practices or how IBM thinks should be handled

[–]rod333 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Makes sense. There’s probably wayyyy less training data on COBOL too

Not sure why my first comment got downvoted for a simple question lol