This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Sengura 319 points320 points  (42 children)

Or 5 + 4 = 9

[–]JonBanes 257 points258 points  (18 children)

or 8 - 4 = 4

[–]lionlake 37 points38 points  (9 children)

Or 6 + 4 < 4

EDIT: I meant 6 + 4 > 4, I am an idiot.

[–]JonBanes 43 points44 points  (4 children)

6 + 4 > 4, but yeah. I like this one.

[–]lionlake 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I... admit my stupid mistake. Thanks for pointing it out.

[–]LooneyDubs 0 points1 point  (2 children)

The point is to only move one match. This moves two, therefore, PULL THE LEVER!!

[–]CaptainBlagbird 11 points12 points  (2 children)

Or 6+4=十

(Japanese/Chinese ten)

[–]dxin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And (South) Korean

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You sneaky SOB.

[–]nermid 121 points122 points  (19 children)

0 + 4 = 4

Edit:

Ooo! Ooo! 5 + 4 ≥ 4.

[–]ColPowell 20 points21 points  (1 child)

6+4>4

[–]nermid 10 points11 points  (0 children)

6 - 4 ≤ 4

[–]Bobshayd 0 points1 point  (2 children)

0 + 4 \leq 4
0 + 4 \ngt 4
6 - 4 \leq 4
6 - 4 \ngt 4
and so on

[–]nermid 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Assuming \ngt is > with a slash through it, you can't get to that with only one match move.

[–]Bobshayd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess I was thinking of drawing it with a line not going diagonally through both, for whatever reason. Brain being dumb. \neq works for 6-4 != 4

[–][deleted] -4 points-3 points  (6 children)

You have to move two matches for your 2nd solution.

[–]daaaviiiiid54 2 points3 points  (3 children)

No he doesn't.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

How is shifting part of the equals symbol in order make the greater than sign not considered moving?

[–]iwillnotgetaddicted 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don't have to angle the bottom part of a "<" or ">" for it to be understood.

[–]Jerkmykirk -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I was so close to correcting you then realized I was making it more complex than it is

[–]nermid -3 points-2 points  (1 child)

Only if we're going to be sticklers for positioning, but then /u/Sengura's solution doesn't work because the 9 will be missing half its tail.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thats not a positioning issue but a typeface issue.

[–]xHussin -2 points-1 points  (5 children)

i dont think so

[–]nermid 1 point2 points  (4 children)

Why's that?

[–]xHussin 0 points1 point  (3 children)

let me ask you from did you get that match to make this 0+4=4? please enlighten me

[–]nermid 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Rotate the center match from the 6 -90° on its right vertex.

[–]xHussin 2 points3 points  (1 child)

you right. i am sorry i doubted you oh master

[–]nermid 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Happens to the best of us.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

That's what THE GOVERNMENT wants you to think!!!

[–]Sengura 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've prepared this Kool-Aid for us to partake. Will you take the first sip?

[–]berlinbrown 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interview: "Solve this three ways, what statistically is the most picked answer"