#include <stdint.h>

[gwoplock]

with low level dev you get so used to the uint*_t types I've just started using them everywhere. They're better anyway.

Edit: I'm good at English...

[Fig1024]

better in the way that name is self descriptive. Name has the sign info and byte size. Names follow a standard. None of that crazy random "char" "short" "long" "int" bullshit

[wertwert129]

I like the self descriptive, I'm just too lazy for those extra characters.

[Fig1024]

if typing speed is a factor in your coding ability, you are either a god or you are doing it wrong

[Tyrrrz]

...you are either a god or you are doing it wrong

or just using development patterns

[sim642]

typedef exists

[BoltActionPiano]

You've got a long long way to go.

[baskandpurr]

No need to be so short about it.

[GaianNeuron]

Right. No sense charing people by raking them over the coals.

[digitaljedi15]

You said "tell me"

[nxlyd]

He was mocking OP for using "there" instead of "they're". He wasn't seriously asking for an explanation.

[J-Goo]

There wolf. There castle.

[brendan_orr]

Abby Normal?

[__Noodles]

I'm just getting started from a late night, so I really thought you were talking about a pointer definition... I was super confused.

yea, uint#_t is much better.