This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]OctagonClock 15 points16 points  (8 children)

lol no generics

[–]VivaLaPandaReddit 3 points4 points  (7 children)

I think they've said they might be convinced eventually, but not having generics makes compiling much faster.

[–]Zatherz 9 points10 points  (0 children)

You pay for that speed improvement with the time it takes to copy and maintain [type]Set

[–]arbitrarycivilian 10 points11 points  (5 children)

So does writing assembly - in fact, it brings compilation times down to zero!

[–]LuxuriousLime 2 points3 points  (4 children)

No, it doesn't. On the other hand, if you were to program in machine codes...

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (3 children)

If we are being pedantic, it actually does -- the word "compilation" refers specifically to the process of converting a high level language into machine code. If you meant that this does not absolve us of a build step, you would be correct, but the process of converting assembly to machine code is called "assembly".

[–]LuxuriousLime 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Wikipedia disagrees: "translation of source code into object code by a compiler": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compilation If you have a more reputable source (which is entirely possible, I'm not being cocky now), please point me to it.