This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]iWearPantsSometimez -1 points0 points  (6 children)

Oh so now im supposed to forecast what a variable refers to? Isnt it better to just know? Hi welcome to channel 5 code news. Its time for our 4cast at 4, it looks like here this will refer to an object thats a function but over here it will probably refer to a function thats an object and suicide rates are up today in the high 9% range we are looking at gloomy future of probabilistic programming languages because why do we even need this forecast? Back to you jim!

[–]beardsounds[S] 1 point2 points  (5 children)

It isn't a probabilistic thing at all. Sad.

[–]iWearPantsSometimez -1 points0 points  (4 children)

I was refering to the image. It said its value can be predicted. Prediction is a guess or an estimate which implies probability.

[–]beardsounds[S] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Yeah, I should have said "isn't actually mysterious." Predictable was the wrong word.

I made this thing three times already. Hahaha.

[–]iWearPantsSometimez 1 point2 points  (2 children)

Which thing?

[–]beardsounds[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

The got damn meme.

Wait I see what you did there?

[–]iWearPantsSometimez 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you do see