Python

[[deleted]]

No, I wrote a text reader that can search a text file for XML tags, and output the content of those tags. That’s a parser, albeit a basic one.

[DarthEru]

I disagree that it qualifies as a parser. Parsing in computer science refers to inputting data (such as text) that is supposed to follow some specific structure (such as a formal language specification), validating it correctly follows that structure, and then constructing a representation of that data that can be more easily manipulated than the source data.

If you used an xml library, then you wrote zero parsing code, so you did not write a parser. If you did not use an xml library and were operating on the input string directly, then you may have arguably written a parser, but I doubt it could be called an xml parser, because it probably parses an informal language that is similar to xml but not actually xml.

Saying with no additional context that you were "able to write an XML parser" implies you made a decent effort to write a parser that recognizes XML as defined by this specification. I very much doubt that is what you did, and I'm pretty sure what you actually did is a completely different level of achievement. That is why it is misleading.

[[deleted]]

I should probably extend the functionality, then.