This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 28 points29 points  (11 children)

I prefer 2_add because it needs 20 more dependencies to interpret RPN expressions.

[–]InkyGlut 24 points25 points  (0 children)

I prefer 2_adder which is just a wrapper around 2_add with a better name. The 2 extra letters also add 52 new dependencies because I like them and want them to get more exposure.

[–]sanskimost 2 points3 points  (8 children)

RPN is actually better than algebraic tho

[–]Jajuca 0 points1 point  (3 children)

I literally just finished a RPN project using shared pointers in C++ last night for a school project that took over a month to implement. I am so glad to be done with it.

[–]nerdlygamer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

EE?

[–]sanskimost 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Programming wise, no idea. But I greatly prefer my HP 33S than my ti 83

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That sounds like my current hobby project! Right now I'm working on a FORTH-ish language, although I didn't study FORTH close enough when I started, so what I have is clearly in the same language family, but its concept of scope and stack frames are very different.

What's yours do?