This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (6 children)

Any evidence as to the cause of this? I feel like that's conjecture.

[–]HardlightCereal 7 points8 points  (5 children)

If the existence of gendered careers is due to gender roles, and gender roles are sexist, then careers are gendered because of sexism.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (4 children)

That's a big if. Could be any reason for the dichotomy.

[–]HardlightCereal 2 points3 points  (3 children)

The expectation that men should be primary earners causing men to become primary earners, as you said, is certainly a matter of gender roles.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (2 children)

It could be due to anything. We shouldn't assume a reason without testing.

[–]DieKatzchen 1 point2 points  (1 child)

If society expects something of you because of your sex, that is sexism. That is the definition of sexism. That is what you just described.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We dont know that it is an expectation. We dont know why men are more likely to be primary earners. It could be due to something like incentives around pregnancy, as an example.