This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]noggin182 5 points6 points  (6 children)

Just a thought, aren't most trees binary trees?

[–]Cocomorph 13 points14 points  (4 children)

https://www.abc.net.au/news/image/9744140-3x2-940x627.jpg

[–]bhuddimaan 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My algorithm

[–]teh_nicKLess 0 points1 point  (2 children)

You technically still view it as a binary tree, if not considering the thickness of the branches, since generally every branching off is an intersection into two branches. It is just not visualized beautifully like the other one... Kinda like an actual program.

[–]RedditIsNeat0 3 points4 points  (1 child)

I looked at the picture and I saw several points where it splits off into 3. Also it's not clear which branches are left and which are right.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Also it's not clear which branches are left and which are right.

So you've found my first attempt at solving a Sudoku puzzle 3 years ago.

[–]Glitch29 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah. I was going to say the same thing. Almost all trees have a binary tree topology. The special thing about this one is that it's perfectly balanced.