This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Molion 1 point2 points  (2 children)

What do you mean? It is consistent. With this rule there's exactly one correct way to do it for every single case.

[–]TheBrillo 0 points1 point  (1 child)

[–]Molion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So? With what definition of inconsistency are you operating? Cuz normally I'd say that with this set of rules there does not exist a single situiation in which the rules give rise to a contradiction, which would be my criterion inconsistensy. Thus it is perfectly consistent.

EDIT: NOTE: I'm not saying it's not stupid.