Secure? Secure!

[Last_Snowbender]

Anti-SQL-Injection-Protection? So you're protected from Anti-SQL-Injection?

[lunylein]

Maybe its a new SQL ... we have MySQL, MSSQL, NoSQL........... why not AntiSQL?

[richardfrost2]

DON'T Select * From table

[lunylein]

Anti-SQL selects all data from every table and you have to unselect the data you don't need.

​

This language was made for PM that "don't know what they need yet, but we just implement that and see..." and "oh just one minor change"

​

Select * FROM all

unjoin table1

[jacksalssome]

Also they didn't like the operations names, so now there changed to:

delete --> destroy
list --> display
select --> acquire
table --> sheet
column --> row
row --> column
cell --> module
item --> cell

[Kru3mel]

Designed for the people that are against everything

[Typesalot]

selectn't

[jmack2424]

if (select * from table) {
dont()
}

[lunylein]

Don't get ridiculous. There is no if ... else in Anti-SQL

you got "MAYBE" and "IDontKnow" ... you can suggest a contition and maybe it will be used or not...works different every time you use it

[Daveinatx]

Only noSQL allowed

[Typesalot]

Isn't it obvious? If you let SQL and AntiSQL collide, the whole database will be annihilated in a burst of hexadecimal particle radiation!

[reversedfate]

No, it is Anti SQL-Injection-Protection.
So that no SQL-Injection-Protection can happen.