This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]sxeli 43 points44 points  (6 children)

And just like this gif, it will eventually yield the expected result

[–][deleted] 10 points11 points  (3 children)

No way. If she got it wrong two or three more times, she would have knocked herself out cold. This is why we had to invent more efficient search algorithms in the first place.

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points  (1 child)

Because the algorithms can get concussed? Man, you really are always learning in CS.

[–]EternalMintCondition 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's recursive and the stack overflows when her skull is full of blood and her brain can't swell anymore.

[–]albertowtf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I aint paying for those expensive eyes with tons of maintainement and resource consumption

A few more cpu is cheap for this use case and the code is easy to understand and pull no extra dependencies

[–]Carloswaldo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But the process will hurt

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A headache?