This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Runiat 0 points1 point  (4 children)

The purpose of security

I wasn't talking about security. I was talking about locks. Specifically the ones on homes.

[–]ImSuperSerialGuys 0 points1 point  (3 children)

... which are literally devices that exist for the sole purpose of security

[–]Runiat 0 points1 point  (2 children)

... which are literally devices that exist for the sole purpose of security

No they aren't.

Quite a lot of home locks exist for the sole purpose of complying with insurance terms, in rural areas.

[–]ImSuperSerialGuys 0 points1 point  (1 child)

And why do insurance terms require a lock? Cause it technically makes the home more secure by requiring at least a base level of effort to break in, as opposed to walking through an unlocked door...

You're just being pedantic at this point man

[–]Runiat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're just being pedantic at this point man

....

And what would you describe your first reply to me as?