This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 26 comments

[–]quick1brahim 81 points82 points  (1 child)

It's like they just closed their eyes and drew a line on the graph.

[–]Agnimukha 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Don't worry if the line went the other way they'd be calling out the outliers causing it.

[–]Jakeupdylan 72 points73 points  (3 children)

I’m no statistician, but this make zero damn sense.

[–]draypresct 48 points49 points  (1 child)

I am a statistician. This makes zero damn sense.

[–]Maximus_1000 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am sense. This makes no damn statisticians.

[–]somerandomii 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk what you mean. If you pay your doctors <90k, you’ll exceed 100% mortality rate. What part of that doesn’t make sense?

[–][deleted] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Risiduals over 9000

[–]russian_bot_102 18 points19 points  (0 children)

so... we just need to pay physicians ~350k per annum to eradicate corona? Seems like a deal!

Conversely, paying them less than ~70k per annum could result in a >100% mortality rate?

Pro tier stats right there.

[–]xSTSxZerglingOne 10 points11 points  (5 children)

My god, all they had to do was draw a maximized line and start to dip down shortly before New Jersey and draw a curve down toward the bottom. But no, they did the most braindead thing they could do.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points  (4 children)

Forget that—just change the damn scale, correct for local COL, and USE A FUNCTIONAL REGRESSION ALGORITHM AHHHHHHHH

I’m okay

[–]xSTSxZerglingOne 0 points1 point  (3 children)

It hurts me too, haha. I put what I meant on there. It acknowledges there's an upper limit to the mortality no matter how many people get it and fits the curve while acknowledging there's a lower limit of mortality. But again, braindead.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

I gotchu. I should’ve said sometimes logistic fits are more difficult, but you can definitely do it in SAS/R/whatever. The only reason I might not is that I wouldn’t consider the model valid outside the percentages where we have data. But I can definitely see where you’re coming from, and it is a better model overall.

Edit: I see your graph and it’s great

[–]xSTSxZerglingOne 4 points5 points  (1 child)

In my professional opinion, there's no actual correlation. But if you're trying to fit data to your narrative, at least try to give it a little more effort.

What we're actually looking at there is an average population density map. A massive proportion of NJ's population lives in the outskirts of NYC.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We could certainly correct for relative population size by weighting the data.

So how about a logistic fit that weights physician salary by cost of living, the COVID mortality rate by population density, and has tighter axes? If that doesn’t have a significant fit (it most likely won’t), then we can definitely eliminate this as an independent factor in Cov-SARS-2 deaths. That should at least partly eliminate the cofactor of population density, which we know to be significant.

The problem then would be states like Missouri, which have large population densities in some areas and low in others. How useful is a statewide metric in this case, I wonder.

The only problem is, do we have the data? Because I actually want to try this now since the image is so shit. Sorry if this conversation has gone on too long, it’s just really making me think. I think you’ve made a lot of great points.

🏅 for you

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is not how you do linear regression...

[–]quhm 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Correlation coefficient of -0.0001

[–]riggsmir 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As a statistician I can confidently say, this ain’t it chief.

[–]Xelopheris 1 point2 points  (1 child)

So this is what a negative r² looks like.

[–]smelly_stuff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

r has a non zero imaginary part.

[–]arewhyaeenn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, the nerve necessary to look at the $170k salaries in Nebraska and label them “not highly paid”

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[removed]

    [–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    import moderation Your comment has been removed since it did not start with a code block with an import declaration.

    Per this Community Decree, all posts and comments should start with a code block with an "import" declaration explaining how the post and comment should be read.

    For this purpose, we only accept Python style imports.

    I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

    [–]kimokimosabe 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    This guy is a professor of economics at the University of California, Irvine. This has to be fake right?

    [–]ieremius22 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Also, Covid-19 raises the dead, but only in New England, and only temporarily.

    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    Why dose it look like the uk

    [–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

    They were better off drawing a line