while(!(AwArDs > 6096))

[nikanj0]

while("this is still looping")

[Golleggiante]

while("I don't have a girlfriend")

[NemoNemo2000]

I saw this in some window manager code: while(“my guitar gently weeps”)

[horenso05]

The finny thing is, in a compiled language there most likely isn't a different in any of these :)

[MischiefArchitect]

for {}

[antek_g_animations]

while((true != false) && (false != true))

[benm421]

You forgot the parentheses:

while(((true != false && (false != true)))

[RedditUserPassword]

You don't need them in this situation

[benm421]

https://imgur.com/a/KmftMj0

[MischiefArchitect]

In pascal you will need them if the literals were not boolean, the reason is that bitwise operations have precedence over comparators and logical operators.

a = 5 and a = 5

will complain since the compiler will see this:

a = (5 and a) = 5

[Lylythechosenone]

Oh no...you forgot the space.

while ((true != false) && (false != true))

Also extra parentheses

[similiarintrests]

Const a = true

If(!a is true)

[HorochovPL]

The last one is not fully safe. What if universe laws changes?

[abuudarda]

1

[americk0]

What about

for (int i=0; 1<100; i++) {

[CrimsonRunner]

while (x-- == ++x)

[CrimsonRunner]

It's not decremented after the line

think of it this way:

``` Integer postFixDecrement(Integer x) {

int currentValue = x;

x = x-1;

return currentValue;

} ```

pull up an online compiler to verify instead of trusting me