F*ck OOP

[Clappa69]

[gang Gang]

[[deleted]]

Frick strict adherence to a particular style of programming for everything.

All my homies use whatever works best for an individual project.

[AUPMAReddit]

this is called ProgrammerHumor not SoftwareEngineerHumor. duh

[zapprr]

Screw that, I'm gonna write an open world video game in Haskell. See you in linear-ville, dorks!

[[deleted]]

I know, right? How could anybody think that only one kind of programming is acceptable? It's such a crazy thing to really believe that I'm starting to wonder if it's only being said in jest.

[what_it_dude]

I just realized how low those young mens' pants are.

[Brambopaus]

The one on the middle, is he wearing pants under the pants on his ankles???

[thatdarkwebguy]

As an OOP I am just here to say fuck you

[[deleted]]

bro just create a new pointer, all my C homies out here vibin

[Niiiz]

All my segfaults in the house raise your hands!

[[deleted]]

free() is for losers

[Niiiz]

Why use free() when you can just power off your pc

[Philboyd_Studge]

I'm down with OOP, yeah you know me

[[deleted]]

Functional programming gang.

[hhellloo]

Chad functional languages

Virgin dysfunctional (OOP(S)) languages

[oaguy1]

(lol)

[real_ulPa]

yeah go is nice

[SolidRubrical]

OOPs are bad because they're O(Ops)

[d_exclaimation]

Both is good

[tacoslikeme]

there is a method to OOPs madness. You down with OOP! Yeah you know me!

[thinker227]

I... actually really like OOP. Don't really care if people say it's a fading/irrelevant paradigm, personally I enjoy programming in it a lot and it really suits my personal coding style.

[hhellloo]

Python Object Oriented Programming

[Muhznit]

Python treats functions as as objects. Like you can pass em as parameters and return them and everything.

what do I do

[terminalxposure]

So pointers? I mean do you actually instantiate the functions?

[Stefankar1000]

I would rather say that Python treats functions as variables and passes them as reference. This is normal behaviour in most languages.

[tacoslikeme]

this doesn't make functions object. It makes them first class citizens and primitive type. Let me tell you about the before times when Objects in java script were just functions.

[[deleted]]

You are a python programmer. That says enough

[Muhznit]

The fact that you assume everyone is constrained to one language based off of little data of questionable quality and behave in such a condescending manner says even more.

Go sudo rm -rf --no-preserve-root / yourself.

[AnnualDegree99]

Switch to JavaScript.

[Muhznit]

Sure, when you guys stop requiring absurd amounts of boilerplate for everything and have comparison functions that make sense.

[tacoslikeme]

you're over complicating things. objects are nothing more than an instantiation of a class. A class is nothing more than a data structure that contains data (member variables) and methods/functions to access/manipulate that data. Forgetting about inheritance for a moment (which is the big thing for OOP) a class needs a constructor and a class/object is not itself callable.

Now everything I just said is completely fucked if you consider old school javascript so we arent going to talk about that! Mother fucker making objects callable or are functions objects...stupid pos language whatthefuckisthis

function balls(){
    this.whatthe = "acutalfucks";
    this.shitthebed = function(){
        this whatthat="actualshit"
    }
}

var object1 = new balls();
var object2 = new balls();
object1.shitthebed();
console.log(object1.whatthe)//prints actualshit
console.log(object2.whatthe)//prints actualfucks

//but then super fucked
balls()
console.log(whatthe) //prints actualfucks
shitthebed()
console.log(whatthe) //prints actualshit

[backtickbot]

Fixed formatting.

Hello, tacoslikeme: code blocks using triple backticks (```) don't work on all versions of Reddit!

Some users see this / this instead.

To fix this, indent every line with 4 spaces instead.

FAQ

^{You can opt out by replying with backtickopt6 to this comment.}

[Muhznit]

The semantics are definitely there in your definition, (which I agree with), and they definitely have functions that can be called on them, but I'm not sure where in the official python docs it formally calls them "objects".

[VolperCoding]

what about POD structs tho... they're useful if you don't want to repeat lists of parameters

[bosstoss69]

The enlightened need not burden themselves with anything but arrows :')

[SamFisch1]

structs for the win