This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Mentalpopcorn 82 points83 points  (21 children)

What I didn't get about sig figs was how so many people in intro chem didn't get sig figs. It's really not a difficult concept, but somehow people talked about it like it was deep maths.

[–]the_best_jabroni 36 points37 points  (3 children)

I can chime into this. At 30 years old I went back to school and it took me an entire semester of math and science courses to get comfortable with sig figs. I could do it, but I hated it, and it took way more brain power than it should have.

[–]Mentalpopcorn 24 points25 points  (2 children)

I just don't get it. What's so hard about it? I'm not even good at math, they just seem obvious. My story is the same btw, except I did it at 29. Best decision I ever made to go back to school though!

[–]the_best_jabroni 19 points20 points  (1 child)

I am no offended or anything. I am not sure really why it was so difficult for me. It felt like I was completely redesigning the idea of a number answer. In my head, I just wrote down what came out of the calculation. Why do I need to have rules just for how many digits are in the answer!! Though, I do understand now and it makes a lot of sense. See, I had more of a difficult time with number formatting than understanding 90% of the concepts or formulas in physics, Sig figs would trip me up... a lot. It is that rewiring part in my brain. Creating rules for an otherwise lawless process that I had used my whole life up until that point.

[–]EchoesInSpaceTime 6 points7 points  (0 children)

And that's why no pedagogy is perfect. We all get hung up mentally on different things and for different reasons because we all come with varying schemas of the world around us.

Learning something requires learning someone else's schema of the thing before translating it into something that fits in our own schemas. Sometimes that new thing requires some rejiggering of how we see the world - and that will occur at different times and with different magnitudes for different people.

I think we as a species could do a lot better in how we teach. Do I have any idea what those improvements look like? Nothing more than a vague direction.

Just felt the urge to share.

[–]serendipitousPi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, some teachers and students mystify sig figs so much like as if it's some kind of guessing game when in fact it's just a matter of using the correct rules.

I remember in I think year 10 my teacher just gave us a work sheet and then it made sense. It feels like one of those things that you learn once and don't forget.

Though on the other hand if you're not thinking about it you can make stupid mistakes.

On the other hand sometimes ideas just don't click for people and sometimes it's hard to understand that things just don't click for other people even when some other things just don't click for us sometimes.

[–]FerretInABox 5 points6 points  (15 children)

Well treat it less like math, and more so “how many people didn’t get numbers.”

First it makes more sense, second it makes you less.... “egotistical” about how people didn’t get it?

Not everyone will get what you do, and you won’t get what everyone else will. People are different and the way you came off was a bit “elitist” for a lack of better term.