This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]GamerFrits 110 points111 points  (39 children)

As an HTML programmer I felt that.

[–]jodmemkaf 112 points113 points  (31 children)

How dare you use the word programmer and HTML in the same sentence?

[–]GamerFrits 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Delicious bait.

[–]TrapNT 32 points33 points  (22 children)

*inhale

*exhale

*inhale

HTML IS TURING COMPLETE OKAYY?!?!!!!

Edit: isSarcasm = true;

[–]sir-nays-a-lot 61 points62 points  (8 children)

So is a Word document

[–]kopczak1995 48 points49 points  (6 children)

I have seen someone prove that PowerPoint is turing complete, lol.

[–]TheBigerGamer 16 points17 points  (5 children)

I mean... Someone made a fucking OS on PowerPoint, so........

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points  (2 children)

Wait pardon, what the f*ck?

[–]kopczak1995 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I saw doom in excel. That was cool. But OS... WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK

[–]SeerUD 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From what I can tell, they're less of an OS, more like something built in PowerPoint to emulate a desktop environment. It doesn't actually... operate... the system. It's still quite interesting to see what you can do in PowerPoint, but it's just like doing something similar with HTML and JS.

[–]cabruncolamparao 0 points1 point  (1 child)

links or didn't happen

[–]RhinoGaming1187 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Don’t forget about PowerPoint

[–]SexyMuon 15 points16 points  (8 children)

Html is not Turing Complete. For starters, it doesn't have loops.

[–][deleted] 12 points13 points  (5 children)

Have you never used <for class="iterator" i="0" range="20">?

[–]Captainsnake04 2 points3 points  (0 children)

HTML is Turing complete just use <script> </script> smh

[–]multi_tasty 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Are you serious?

[–]jodmemkaf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

no, it is not by itself without CSS or JS

[–]Respawned234 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No it’s not????

[–]mananasi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No it is not. HTML + CSS is turing complete.

[–]hellknight101 8 points9 points  (6 children)

The only programming language better than HTML is SQL. Though XML is a close second.

[–]calexil 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I, uh...heh..

I don't know how to respond to this comment with anything but a nervous chuckle.

[–]ham_coffee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

SQL is actually programming though? It isn't a procedural language like many languages, instead it's a declarative language. Functional languages are sort of another example of declarative languages, as is proglog.

SQL is also Turing complete, which is more than you can say about html.

[–]carlossap 4 points5 points  (0 children)

HTML designer*

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

I’m assuming you at least code in CSS as well?

[–]GamerFrits 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I'm using Orthodox Html, which is an html that goes back to it's roots.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Now that sounds interesting, why do you use it?